Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
More Videos
#DIANAOLICK ON TWITTER
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Huge Spike in Home Prices Is Not Real
- Investor Caution: Beware of Heat in Distressed Housing
- Foreclosures Move East as Hardest-Hit Markets Clear
- Foreclosures Fall...And That's a Bad Thing?
- After a Dip, Homebuilder Sentiment Surges Again
- Obama’s ‘Responsible’ Reno Homeowners: Are They?
- Mortgage Market Still Hampers Housing Recovery
- Bank of America Offers Principal Reductions to 200,000 Homeowners
- Short Sales: Necessary Compromise or Scamming the System?
MOST SHARED
- JPMorgan Trading Loss: Did Regulators Miss the Risk?
- RIM May Cut at Least 2,000 Jobs in Restructuring: Report
- Marc Faber: 100% Chance of Global Recession
- How Nasdaq Lost Control of Facebook IPO, by the Minute
- Bacon Tourism: From the Davos of Bacon to Bacon Mecca
- Heard in More US States: See You in Tax Court!
- 5 Spots Where the Dollar Buys a Great Vacation
- What College Tuition Will Look Like in 18 Years
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- How Nasdaq Lost Control of Facebook IPO, by the Minute
- Week Ahead: Europe Has Wall Street Bull on Short Leash
- Pro-Bailout Greeks Regain Lead in Polls Before Vote
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- RIM May Cut at Least 2,000 Jobs in Restructuring: Report
- EU Finalizes Bank Reforms; Shifts Burden to Bondholders
- Spain's Bankia Eyes Stake Sales After Record Bailout
- EU Set to Launch Action Against China Over Telecom Aid
RSS FEED
Realty Check
Text Size 
Reasons NOT To Modify Troubled Home Loans
 |
CNBC.com |
I've heard a lot of arguments against, but today I read the most compelling testimony from David Kittle, Chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association before the Senate Judiciary Committee:
First, no one should make filing for bankruptcy appear attractive. There are real and severe consequences for consumers who declare bankruptcy. Bankruptcy stays on a credit report for seven to ten years. It makes it very difficult to acquire future credit for a new home or car. It can stand in the way of getting insurance. It can make it harder to get a new job or even to rent a home or an apartment.
Two-thirds of those people who file for bankruptcy are unable to fulfill the terms of their repayments plans. Two thirds. In other words, two-thirds of those who file will still lose their home, and still have the bankruptcy on their record.
Second, changing the law will force lenders to impose tougher standards on people trying to get a mortgage. Cramdown legislation would add new risks to the calculation lenders make in setting prices. For the first time, lenders will have to pay more attention to markets with the most volatility and those with higher risks, such as rural areas, inner cities and new subdivisions, where history shows the greatest fluctuation of home values. This could even lead to a new era of redlining. Lenders would be forced to demand larger down payments and raise interest rates to balance the risk from judges who could change the mortgage contract and cause lenders or investors to suffer an economic loss.
Third, as you know, our financial markets are incredibly fragile right now. Cramdown legislation will only add more instability. The only option for many low-income borrowers today is to get an FHA-insured loan, where the government minimizes the risk to the lender of making a low-down payment loan. Cramdown legislation would make it harder for borrowers to get an FHA loan, because lenders would face the possibility that FHA insurance would not cover the loss from a principal reduction. The same is true for VA lending. In effect, Congress would end the only meaningful lending option currently available to most low-income borrowers - almost overnight.
I have to say I've never focussed on that last one regarding FHA loans. FHA's slice of the mortgage pie (sorry, Thanksgiving on the mind) has grown exponentially in the last year, and therefore so too has its importance as a driver of the housing recovery.
To put the FHA loans farther out of reach would, I fear, be even more detrimental than making bankruptcy more attractive. Also, given how risk-averse the current financial system is, adding to it with the unknown random judges making near-random decisions on loans, could throw yet another wrench into the mortgage-backed securities market, which, as we all know, is basically on life support as it is.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
