- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Klutzy Woz Becomes Auto Body Pitchman
- Google Goes After Microsoft, Kind Of
- Flip Backfires on Cisco's John Chambers
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Four Things You Should Be Doing Now To Break Out
- Proprietary Trading May Cause October Crash: Investor
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
RSS FEED

![]() |
Blackberry Bold |
So what might this mean for Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
] and its iPhone?
Consider that RIM [RIMM
Loading...
()
] took pains in its release this morning to spotlight macro-economic issues, including an unfavorable currency exchange rate, a global economic slowdown, softer than expected sales, margin issues, supply and component shortages and a bunch of other stuff. Not spotlighted, however, are the ongoing execution issues plaguing RIM as it tries to get its new products on store shelves, but just hasn't been able to. The Bold was late. The Storm was late. And despite the company downplaying slight delays here and there, in an economic climate like this one, companies simply cannot afford execution snafus. And they're riddling RIM.
That just doesn't seem to be the case at Apple. Sure the company is at risk from the same economic headwinds, but the more its competition missteps, the more opportunity a nimble company like Apple has to gain market share. That's a big problem for RIM and any other company trying to stem the iPhone juggernaut. The fact is, Apple has been able to capitalize on competitor problems, most notably RIM. Sure, Apple had some issues with the original launch of the iPhone. Remember, it was delayed and the company had to switch engineering teams from other products to the iPhone to make sure it dropped close to the original release date everyone was anticipating.
But iPhone wasn't a part of Apple's core competency at the time. It was a new product, a blockbuster product, something the industry had never seen before, and something Apple had never built before. You can cut the company some slack when its pushing the innovation curve the likes of which no other company before it had ever attempted. Not the case at RIM. New product delays are inexcusable; but not nearly as inexcusable as the company downplaying those delays as they're happening. Hubris like that tends to cost a company, which it has these last few months with RIM shares down a staggering 70 percent so far this year.
RIM's market cap today sits at around $21 billion. This was a $80 billion company a year ago. Some might argue that it was unfairly inflated back then. And some might argue that it has been unfairly devalued since then. I'd argue, of course, that the truth sits somewhere in the middle. RBC cut its price target on RIM today from $65 to $45 amid the profit warning this morning. Analyst Mike Abramsky cites widespread demand deterioration, but definitely emphasizes the company's execution problems as a "significant issue in this warning."
I'd agree. Apple too has not been immune from execution issues in the past. It's had problems with Mac. And iPod. And iPhone too. But in this what-have-you-done-for-me-lately kind of world, iPhone's technology trumps the Blackberry; and thanks to Apple's meticulous attention to execution, iPhone's been thumping Blackberry in the marketplace.
Questions? Comments?







