- Schmidt on Social Media, Ads and Hulu
- Sun Valley on Social Media
- Eric Schmidt + Larry Page on Revolutionizing Computing
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Twitter in the Sun Valley Spotlight
- Sun Valley Dealmaking Confab Kicks Off
- Making Money on Michael Jackson's Memorial
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Another Music Lawsuit, but with an Unexpected Target
- Will Newspaper Readers Pay For Digital Content?
- Schmidt on Social Media, Ads and Hulu
- Sun Valley on Social Media
- Eric Schmidt + Larry Page on Revolutionizing Computing
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Twitter in the Sun Valley Spotlight
- Sun Valley Dealmaking Confab Kicks Off
- Making Money on Michael Jackson's Memorial
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Another Music Lawsuit, but with an Unexpected Target
- Will Newspaper Readers Pay For Digital Content?
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Investing in Tech Now
- What You'll See On My NASCAR Documentary Tonight
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- Warren Buffett's Complete Sun Valley CNBC Interview - Transcript and Video
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon Counting
- Apartment Vacancy Rate Hits 22-Year High
- Preparing for Retirement
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- 15 Stocks to Consider
- Maximum Bob Goes Full Throttle For GM
- Najarian: Options Get Bullish on Cisco
- Sun Valley on Social Media
- Four Hardware Stocks Upgraded by Goldman
- Eric Schmidt + Larry Page on Revolutionizing Computing
- Warren Buffett's Complete Sun Valley CNBC Interview - Transcript and Video
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- July 10th in Market History
- Trade Deficit Lowest in 10 Years; Import Prices Jump
- Obama: Full Economic Recovery 'A Ways Off'
- Cisco Cutting up to 2,000 Jobs, Analyst Says
- Geithner To Call for Policing of Derivatives
- AIG Prepares to Pay More Bonuses to Executives
- UBS Can't Comply with US Request: Internal Memo
- Treasury Sold Warrants Below Market Value: Panel
- Chevron Warns Earnings Hit by Weak Refining Margins
- Christmas in July: Consumers to Out-Scrooge Scrooge
RSS FEED

![]() |
CNBC.com |
The investors claimed they decided to make the investment based on "specific risk mitigation techniques" that the studio said it used but then abandoned. The group now expects to lose its $40 million investment, saying the reason they're not getting their money back is because Paramount didn't, as promised, employ risk-reduction strategies including international pre-sales and what's called insurance wrap co-financing, which transfers the risk of a poor-performing slate of films to insurers.
Th $40 million was invested in a series of movies, part of the studio's "Melrose" slate. Studios group films together into "slates" to try to spread out risk, reassuring investors that they're not investing in a single film which could be a hit or a bomb, but rather a broad basket of diverse films, which together have a better chance of success.
Paramount's response to the lawsuit denies the claims, saying that these investors knew exactly what they were getting into: "We are disappointed that these sophisticated investors, who agreed to accept the widely known risks of investing in a slate of motion pictures, are attempting through litigation to undo the bargain they struck in 2004...We intend to establish in court that these allegations are entirely without merit."
So no settlement here. Forty million won't make or break Viacom, but in this economic environment, neither side is going to let this one go.
Questions? Comments?







