- Pros Say: Oil Price Plunge = Huge Tax Cut
- Embattled Fund Shifts Cost of Suits to Investors
- CEOs Weigh In on How To Revive Economy
- Trump Sees Act of God in Recession
- Huge Job Losses Could Be Signal That Worst Is Over
- Energy Goals a Moving Target for States
- Brown-Forman Profit Rises; Boosts 2009 Outlook
- Congress Struggles to Find Rescue Plan for Automakers
- Treasurys Get No Boost From Economic Gloom
- Lightning Round: General Mills, Coach, Praxair and More
- Lightning Round OT: Suntech, Seagate and More
- Cramer's M&A Moneymakers
- Game Plan: Retail's Real Winner This Season
- Cramer's Reasons for Holiday Cheer
- Your First Move For Monday December 8th
- Web Extra: Fast & Furious Trades For Monday
- Bear Market Boot Camp, Pt. 3
- Pops & Drops: Amazon, Sears...
- US ag chief: China, US agree on free farm trade
- India's central bank cuts key interest rates
- China's first private jet hub to open next year
- 3M cutting 1,800 jobs around world in 4th quarter
- Central America promotes joint credit fund
- Detroit Three automakers seek aid from Canada
- Hewlett-Packard says top EDS executive to retire
- Inflation at 32.7 percent in Venezuelan capital
- Movers roundup: Chesapeake Energy, Chico's FAS
- Movers roundup: Berry Petroleum, AT&T
NEW YORK - A New York judge has dismissed shareholders' lawsuits contesting JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s fire sale buyout of Bear Stearns.
Manhattan Justice Herman Cahn says Bear Stearns officials tried to save some of the company's $1.5 billion value and avoid bankruptcy, which could have had "potentially cataclysmic consequences" for shareholders and the economy.
The lawsuits contend JPMorgan's offer of $10 a share was too low. JPMorgan Chase & Co. now owns 44.9 percent of Bear Stearns Cos.
The judge also said Bear Stearns' directors were protected from liability by the business judgment rule, which says company leaders who make decisions in good faith cannot be blamed if things go wrong as a result.
Cahn said bankruptcy might have left shareholders with nothing, adding: "The court should not, and will not, second guess" the directors' decisions.


