![]()
- Warren Buffett: Stocks Will Outperform Gold and Bonds
- 'Mortgage Deal from Hell' Hurts Sound Borrowers: Bove
- Markets Finally Get Greek Deal —So Where's the Rally?
- Zynga and Hasbro Announce Toy-Making Partnership
- Activision Beats on Earnings, Raises Dividend
- Westminster’s Most Successful Dog Breeds
- LinkedIn Outperforms on Earnings, Revenue
- Fidelity: 401(k) Balances Little Changed Over 2011
- Are Young American Workers a 'Lost Generation'?
MOST SHARED
- Top Five Mistakes to Avoid in Online Dating
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- Victor Cruz ‘Understands’ Gisele's Super Bowl Frustrations
- Stocks Log 3-Day Gain, Dow at 3-1/2 Year High
- Warren Buffett: Stocks Will Outperform Gold and Bonds .. and They're Safer 'By Far'
- Roger Altman: Austerity Deal Buys Greece Time
- The Euro Still Has Room to Rise: Strategist
- Westminster’s Most Successful Dog Breeds
- Concordia Cruise Ship Captain Admits He Was 'Rash'
- Markets Get Greece Deal, So Where's the Big Rally?
MOST POPULAR
HOT ON FACEBOOK
Thain Pain: Why Some CEOs SHOULD Get Bonuses
All of America now can rest easy: Merrill Lynch chief John Thain won’t get his $10 million bonus after all, having succumbed to browbeating calls for fiscal restraint.
Upside: Maybe we can avoid another round of outrage from Congressmen and other whiners who are shocked—shocked!—that anyone on Wall Street could get paid so handsomely, much less actually deserve it.
Downside: Thain gets screwed out of what rightfully was his, for he did deserve a bonus, for myriad reasons. Same goes, arguably, for Morgan Stanley chief John Mack and the seven senior execs at Goldman Sachs, all of whom will forgo any year-end payout. Worse, this whole kerfuffle may embolden the self-righteous, sanctimonious mob that now decries wealth creation and the profit motive. Where were all these populist prudes when the stock market was rising 63% from 2003 through October 2007? Answer: They were fat and happy and counting their money.
It’s one thing when a greedy fatcat utterly fails his shareholders, guts his company and walks away with an undeserved windfall. Two lamentable examples: the $42 million parachute for Charles Prince, who flopped at integrating the smokestacks of Citigroup and let it plunge head-first into the subprime debacle; and the $160 million sendoff for Stanley O’Neal, accumulated over an entire career at Merrill Lynch before he looked the other way while his traders loaded up on wild-eyed risk.
John Thain, by contrast, was brought in only a year ago to fix the Merrill mess, and he worked 24/7 to do it. Troubled rivals Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns dilly-dallied—rather than swallow their pride and sell themselves to healthier partners—and they went belly-up, pretty much. Thain, by contrast, handed Merrill [MER
Loading...
()
] over to Bank of America [BAC
Loading...
()
]. Since mid-September, just before that deal popped, the stock price of Citigroup [C
Loading...
()
] is down 43% and Goldman [GS
Loading...
()
] is down 46%—but Merrill shares are up 5%.
That’s a gain of more than $1 billion in market cap for that floundering firm, so a $10 million bonus barely is a rounding error. Ten million bucks, in fact, is equivalent to how much revenue Merrill collects in just 20 minutes, based on a 40-hour work-week.
'Funny Business' with Jane Wells:
Yet now we’re gonna take pleasure in stiffing John Thain? Sounds a little punitive to me.
This CEO backlash, moreover, could spread far beyond Wall Street to infect the entire U.S. economy. Yet, last year, median pay rose only 1.3% and bonuses fell by 5% for the CEOs of more than 230 multibillion-dollar companies, even as their stock prices rose an average of 7.5%, says the research firm Equilar. At financial giants the median pay package fell 20% in 2007, and Wall Street now braces for haircuts of 40% to 70%.
Okay, so some CEO pay is way out of whack, and too often mediocre performance is rewarded richly. In the late 1970s the bigwigs earned an average of 30 times the rank-and-file worker’s paycheck, and by this decade the gap widened past 300x. But this owes mainly to the fixes put in place a decade ago, in an earlier crusade to reduce CEO pay. Comp critics wanted to tie CEO pay more closely to a company’s stock performance, so stock options came into vogue and, in the long bull run that followed, the rich got vastly richer.
(CNBC's Dennis Kneale and Larry Kudlow talk about recent market moves with Doug Kass, Seabreeze Partners Management; Jason Trennert, Strategas Research Partners in the video)
But trying, yet again, to ensure a corporate chieftain doesn’t earn “too much” money is a matter best left to boards and shareholders—not to politicians and union demogogues and irate day traders. (My favorite new tack: clawbacks.) Alas, I don’t hear anyone suggesting we cut the pay of other culprits in this crisis: Barney Frank and other lawmakers for inflating the Fannie-Freddie housing bubble; Securities and Exchange Commission chief Christopher Cox for letting risk run amok; and tens of thousands of people who lied about their finances to land super-cheap loans to buy more house than they could afford.
Oh no, that would be wrong—let’s take it out on the CEOs. It’s more fun that way.
- Many have called to abolish the Federal Reserve. But what would happen if it was dissolved for good?
- Entrepreneurs have increasingly been buying back their companies over the last three years.
- Where are the best city locations for singles to take the online dating plunge?
- A Steelers fan spent a week with wide receiver Antonio Brown- and it was all due to tweeting.
- Here’s a look at the woman behind the newest collectible toy that kids love.
- Grab a brew—or not—and click ahead to experience the world’s most highly rated beers.











