BIO
MOST SHARED
- Kuoni CEO Sees Recovery in Travel Sector
- US Markets Bracing for Selloff On Worries About Dubai's Debt
- Gold Retreats from Record High as Dollar Rebounds
- China Unveils Carbon Target Ahead of Copenhagen
- UK's Darling to Downgrade 2009 Growth Forecast
- No Thanksgiving Rest for Retailers in Sales Race
- Great Britain, No Longer That Great: Investor
- Dubai Struggles to Ease Debt Fears; Investors Rattled
- Attraction of Switzerland to Businesses
- 4 Enemies of Bull Markets
- Experiencing Technical Difficulty?
- The Importance of Good Breadth
- Your First Move For Friday November 27th
- How Big Money Rules the Markets
- Web Extra: Private Equity, Conviction Buy?
- Follow the Leader
- Pops & Drops: Abercrombie & Fitch, Nucor...
- Giving Thanks: Seymour
- Your Questions About... Alcoa & The Dollar
RSS FEED
Kiss the future goodbye! This week's 33% decline the price of oil is great news for minivan driving soccer moms and suburbanites of all races, colors and creeds. But it's terrible news for the fight against global warming. In fact, with crude at $33.87 a barrel, I think it's safe to say the war against climate change is over. Climate change won.
Environmental activists talk a good game, but the truth is, the only reason "green" anything became viable over the last couple of years was the high price of oil. We didn't all of a sudden become more altruistic and decide to save the world. Al Gore may have won an Oscar and an Nobel, but the real reason alternative energy gained steam was that old-fashioned energy got too expensive.
Cheap oil means that green energy projects, solar, wind, you name it, can't compete economically against fossil fuels. And while we may be burning less oil for now--crude is cheap due to weak demand--it's low price means we won't invest as much in the cleaner, greener alternatives we need to help stop global warming.
For a while there, it really looked like high oil prices would solve the problem of climate change. People were driving less and buying cars with better gas mileage, companies were investing in alternatives. Now the real incentive for all that environmentally friendly behavior is gone.
Maybe Barack Obama will throw a lot of money at green energy projects, maybe he'll subsidize the heck out of them. But he's going to need to spend a whole lot more on those projects than he would have if oil were still at even $50 a barrel.
I believe global warming is a serious problem. I don't know how bad it could make things, but the cheaper oil gets, the more I believe the most alarmist predictions about what could happen to our planet. And if anyone saw the movie Waterworld, that future is both horrendous and incredibly boring.
We need more than just investment in green infrastructure. We need a tax on gasoline, or better yet, a wholesale carbon tax, so that oil becomes expensive again. Only this time the excess profits will go to the government, the people, not the oil companies. That's the only way to deal with climate change, unless of course the economy recovers and the price of oil comes roaring back. But I just don't see that happening anytime soon. Do you?
Questions? Comments? Send them to
- What you need to know.
- Ever wished your cab driver would stop nattering and just get to where you're going? Well that moment is near(er).
- Eric Schmidt pledges to create a virtual copy of the Iraq National Museum at Google’s expense.
- Bill Griffeth is taking a leave of absence from CNBC and Power Lunch for a year. Here's a message from Bill.
- More shoppers than ever plan to comparison-shop this season. Who will benefit?
- It may be the most unusual guide to business you'll read.









