FEATURED SLIDESHOW
Who Is The Worst CEO?Mad Money needed new inductees for its
Wall of Shame, so we asked viewers for
nominations.
RECENT POSTS
- Money-Making Mood Stabilizers
- No Product Revenues, Plenty of Risk: Buy Exelixis?
- Lightning Round: Caterpillar, Starbucks, Intel and More
- Lightning Round OT: SanDisk, Marvel Entertainment and More
- The Discounter’s Dilemma
- Cramer: Earnings, IPOs Dominate Next Week’s Game Plan
- Cramer: GE Upgrade 'Very Powerful'
- 2 Takeover Targets in the Pharma Market
- Lightning Round: Bank of America, Crocs, Inergy and More
- Lightning Round OT: Royal Bank of Scotland, Seabridge Gold and More
MAD MONEY FEATURES
PODCASTSWatch the Lightning Round whenever and wherever you want.
OFFICIAL MAD MONEY WIDGETGrab this all-in-one application and get recaps of the show sent right to your desktop or blog.
CRAMERS SOUNDBOARDAdmit it: You've always wanted to hit the "They
know nothing!" button. Here’s your chance.
CHECK OUT OUR PHOTOSCheck out Cramer on set, back to school, behind the scenes and more.
SHOP FOR MAD MERCHANDISEBuy Cramer books, bobbleheads and other Mad Money merchandise.
RING TONESPick up the phone! It's Cramer! New Mad Money sounds for your cell phone.
TEXT MESSAGE ALERTMad Money's mobile. Get show highlights sent to your phone.
Text Size 
President-Elect Barack Obama’s incoming SEC chair should get rid of ultra short exchange-traded funds, Cramer said during Monday’s Mad Money, but not just for the most obvious.
Cramer’s railed against these ETFs before. These are the funds that take a dollar’s investment and turn it into two. So $5,000 in an ultra short becomes $10,000, doing extra damage to a targeted stock. This is how hedge funds and other big money managers have been able to drive the financials, just to pick one group, into near oblivion. The practice has left our banking system on the brink of collapse and no doubt cost you a chunk of change to boot.
Even worse, though, is that these ETFs don’t actually work as an investment. Look: As of Dec. 17, the Dow Jones US Real Estate Index was down 39.2% year to date. You’d assume then that the UltraShort Real Estate ProShares ETF (ticker symbol SRS) would be up big, but it’s not. In fact, it’s down 48.3% for the year. Even with 100% leverage SRS underperformed the sector it was short. A very similar thing happened at UltraShort Financials ProShares (SKF). While its corresponding sector, the Dow Jones US Financial index, was down 49.3%, SKF was up only 1.4%.
The explanation here, Cramer pointed out, is that these ETFs rebalance daily. They track the day-to-day changes in the sectors they cover. So any volatility can negate these funds’ long-term performance. And since these funds by definition create extra volatility, they offer virtually no returns – or worse: negative returns.
So why then do these ultra short ETFs exist at all? To sidestep margins rules. Normally, an investor needs to borrow from a broker to short with credit, and have a required amount of reserve capital before he does. With these funds, those limitations no longer exist.
Cramer’s suggestion: Get rid of these ultra short ETFs, incoming SEC Chairperson Mary Schapiro, right after you reinstate the uptick rule.
Questions for Cramer?
Questions, comments, suggestions for the Mad Money website?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes