![]()
- Peak Oil Closer Than IEA Forecasts Show: Report
- UK Most at Risk of Losing Top Credit Rating: Fitch
- GM CEO Starts Charm Tour at Opel in Germany
- Vodafone Extends Cost-Cutting Scheme, Hits Targets
- Bad Debt Weighs on Barclays Earnings
- HSBC Operating Profit Beats, US Bad Debts Slip
- Fed's Tarullo Backs Surcharges to Limit Bank Size
- Look Ahead: 'Risk On' Sentiment Could Fuel Rally Further
- 'Modern Warfare 2': Biggest Entertainment Event?
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Warren Buffett to Sell Stakes In Union Pacific & Norfolk Southern
- Nov. 9: Unusual Volume Leaders
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Merck’s Mega-Monday Morning
- Why are Traders Bullish on This Food Company?
- Profiting From Natural Gas: Strategists
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
MOST SHARED
- Obama Sees Strains Unless US, China Balance Growth
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Future of Marketing
- Mad Mail: Buy the Berkshire Hathaway Split?
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
- GM CEO Starts Opel Charm Tour in Germany
- Framed for Porn – By a PC Virus
- A Year on, China's Stimulus Postpones its Problems
- Israel: Leader of Business Innovation
Citigroup's board may have said it is standing behind CEO Vikram Pandit, but the general consensus on Wall Street is that he is running out of time.
![]() |
Mary Altaffer / AP |
The reason's are twofold: Pandit's sudden about-face in agreeing to shed the Smith Barney brokerage unit to Morgan Stanley [MS
Loading...
()
], and the expected announcement of a major reorganization that will refocus Citigroup back to its core global banking business.
Pandit is thus ditching Citigroup's [C
Loading...
()
] decade-long emphasis on being a financial supermarket, which until now he has supported.
The problem with Pandit, people on Wall Street say, is vision—or the lack of it.
While he can't be blamed for the large losses Citi has suffered because of its bad bet on real estate debt, they say, he can be blamed for not seeing that the financial supermarket model, created by former CEO Sandy Weill, wasn't working and would probably never work.
Wall Street executives say board members are growing impatient with Pandit. And now that the Federal government is increasingly involved in Citi's operations, they will be pressuring Pandit for results.
![]() |
Citigroup Vikram Pandit |
"Pandit remains vulnerable," says one high ranking executive at a major Wall Street firm who frequently speaks with board members of various Wall Street firms. "People are questioning his vision and they don't understand this deal with Morgan Stanley."
Under the terms of the joint venture with Morgan Stanley, Citigroup will retain a 49% share of the combined brokerage operations. But over time, Morgan Stanley can purchase the entire franchise.
Pandit is essentially monetizing Smith Barney—thought to be Citigroup's crown jewel for its huge profit margins—at the bottom of the market when he could have sold the unit for much more money in 2007 and late 2006 when many analysts were calling for the breakup of Citigroup.
A spokesman for Citigroup says Pandit's job is safe and the board has affirmed his status.
Top officials at Citigroup also say it's unfair to blame Pandit for the firm's problems because he inherited the mortgage mess, and then needed to take time to evaluate the firm's operations.
He only decided to reverse course on Citi's business model in recent weeks as losses piled up, and the federal government—which has injected $45 billion to prop up Citi's balance sheet— began pressuring Pandit to get Citigroup's finances in order.
- Do free market libertarians really believe what they say about ethics and shareholder value? The Big Money takes a look.
- Cramer did the research and found eight stocks that lead the pack. Read on to get his top picks.
- On the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, many in the former Eastern Bloc recall communism fondly.
- Software, biotech firms, even banks are watching a particular Supreme Court argument today.
- From politicians to CEOs to companies, here's your chance to vote for the winners and losers of 2009.
- The health care reform bill that passed the House on Saturday will have a much harder time in the Senate.













