RSS FEED
- Links: More Important Than We May Think
- Changing What Was Said
- Radio Rounds: A Job Loss and Education
- A Big Net Deal: Getting Staff's Attention
- Site Hot Links? Fear and Greed
- Balloon Boy: Not Your Average Business Story
- Hot Items: Gold, Gifts and Gritty Prison Fights
- Hot Links for Monday
- Swine Flu By Any Other Name ... Like H1N1
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- GM's Agreement to Sell Saab To Swedish Firm Falls Apart
- US Home Prices Up 5th Month, 2nd Straight Quarter
- FDIC Fund Falls into The Red, Bair Urges Lending
- Buyers Look For Bargains At Luxury Condo Auction
- Weak Dollar Is Golden for Mining Companies
- Revised GDP Reading Puts Growth at 2.8%; Inflation Tame
- Behind The Scenes With Warren Buffett
- Gold Will Collapse Like Oil Did in 2008: Charts
- CA "More Profitable" After Saving Energy: CEO
- On Twitter, Beware False Prophets
- Halftime Report: Is Oil Heading To $96?
- Novartis 'Cells' Its Flu Vaccine Technology
- Silicon Valley and Hollywood Now Fast Friends
- The Lloyd's Prayer, Leggo My Eggo, Plate Hate & Your Emails
- The L.A. Extravaganza: A Test for Auto Shows
- 8 Stocks That Could Gain With Rising GDP
- Remorseful Regulator Leads Reform Fight
- Lightning Round: AT&T, Verizon, Novartis and More
- Lightning Round OT: Alcoa, Weight Watchers and More
I love history. It's like journalism, just older.
There was a really good history segment on Squawk Box this morning: Depression-era stocks that ended up doing really well over the next couple of decades. Few of those stocks exist in pure form these days.
Examples?
Electric Boat (a submarine maker now part of General Dynamics [GD
Loading...
()
])
Zenith (radio, then TV, now part of LG Group)
American-Hawaiian Steamship (now no more)
Very cool segment. You can watch the whole thing in the video.
One problem. It was based on an article by one of our competitiors, SmartMoney.com.
This awkward situation happens a lot. Our TV brethern, in their quest to provide the best programming available, often bring in writers and editors from various publications and Web sites to talk about their work or current events.
But these other Web sites and to a certain extent text operations are CNBC.com's competitors. Now we strive to put the best of what our network offers, plus our own original reports and features, on the Web site. But does that mean giving our competition a boost?
There are various ways of looking at this. And I always try to look at it from the reader's point of view. What's best for them? Me keeping the competition off the site, or letting readers know about some cool stuff?
Here's the link to SmartMoney's story ... and I guess my answer.







