- Schork Oil Outlook: Nat Gas Bulls Didn’t Stand A Chance
- Farr: An Extended Period—No Fat Lady in Sight
- Schork Oil Outlook: More Strength in Crude
- Pociask: In The Electronics War Does The Consumer Really Win?
- Busch: G20 Affirms Weak Dollar
- What Stocks to Buy Amid Health Care Overhaul: Strategist
- Tamminen: Why Does Oklahoma Want To Drown New York?
- Stimulus II? Jobs Tax Credit=Cash For Clunkers
- Busch: It Ain't All Bad News
- Keith Bergelt: The Case for Market Based Patent Reform
MOST SHARED
- Hewlett-Packard to Acquire 3Com for $2.7 Billion in Cash
- This Town Will Pay YOU $10,000 to Buy a House
- Credit Is Thawing, But Businesses Still Hesitant to Borrow
- Addicted to Easy Money?
- Why Stronger Chinese Yuan Would Benefit US Investors
- Oil Tomorrow
- The Bra That Doubles as a Putting Green
- Nov. 11: Unusual Volume Leaders
- HP's Shot Across Cisco's Bow
- USC Football Blog Leads All-Access Space
- Clowning Around At Work
- Ahead of Earnings Disney Restructures Studio
- Nov. 11: Unusual Volume Leaders
- 3 'Clear Sailing' Mid-Caps For Investors: Strategist
- Intimate Apparel Sales Heating Up: Maidenform CEO
- A Day On The USS Harry S. Truman
- Expect Stocks to End the Year Lower: Market Pro
- Why Stronger Chinese Yuan Would Benefit US Investors
- Hewlett-Packard to Acquire 3Com for $2.7 Billion in Cash
- AIG CEO: I Remain 'Totally Committed' to Firm
- How the Droid and Google Threaten the GPS Makers
- A Day on the USS Harry S. Truman
- Commercial Real Estate Near Disaster: Fund Manager
- This Town Will Pay YOU $10,000 to Buy a House
- Billionaire Paulson Raises Cadbury Stake Again
- Applied Materials Profit, Sales Top Wall Street Forecasts
RSS FEED
CNBC Guest Blog
Text Size 
Over the weekend, the UK government indicated another plan to shore up troubled banks.
The latest is to allow banks to insure against steep losses and guarantee their debt.
According to Reuters, "The plan raises the government's stake in Royal Bank of Scotland, which said it lost over 20 billion pounds last year, and also lays the framework for the Bank of England to boost money supply.
Barclays, whose shares fell 25 percent on Friday, confirmed it expected to report full-year profit above the consensus estimate." Note, the UK government had already taken majority ownership in RBS with little improvement to the credit situation and no increases in lending.
Spherically, the UK government is going to offer guarantees on consumer loans, outline a plan to section off "toxic" assets on the bank's balance sheets, and refinance the preferred shares for RBS and HBOS.
The hope is to clear the assets that are forcing banks to continue to increase capital thereby allowing them to begin to lend "freely" again. Remember with this structure, the risk is that government officials begin to decide how to allocate the capital they inject in the banks.
Simultaneously, there are reports out suggesting that the US Treasury Secretary-designate Tim Geithner is working on a plan to do something similar.
In the US, the plan is to create a "Bad Bank" or "Aggregator Bank" to send the toxic assets to for disposal. The WSJ carries an interview with FDIC's Bair discussing movement from the theoretical to actual plan.
"The idea would be to set up a facility, it could be structured as a bank, to capitalize it with some portion of the TARP funds.
Financial institutions that wanted to sell assets into the bank could also perhaps take part of their payment as an equity interest in the aggregator bank to provide an additional cushion.
If you sold $1 of assets into the bank, you would get 80 cents in cash and you would get 20 cents in an equity interest in the bank.
So that would be an additional cushion against loss....With a combination of private equity contributions plus TARP capital, I think you could leverage that into some fairly significant volume to purchase assets.”
The key here would be that the US does not take control of the banks nor does it get into the business of dictating where the banks should lend. They simply remove the problem that is causing the credit condition and get out of the way.
However, there is a remaining issue. By taking over the negative component to the banking system, the solution doesn't address the management of the banks.
I'm not suggesting that the US take over decision making or be involved in running these financial institutions.
However, the system now exists in a netherworld between common stock shareholders who have lost so much money they have little modification to force change to the US government buying preferred shares with no mandate to change management's structure.
In other words, the owners of the company aren't doing what owners do when the stock of company falls dramatically.
If the US government wants to clean up these balance sheets, then they need to do so quickly and get out of the way by allowing the scrubbed up financial entities to sink or swim on their own.
Is Financial Crisis Growing Worse—Or Is It Just Us?
________________________
 |
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes