- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
- HP's Shot Across Cisco's Bow
- Back Off, Regulators!
- CNBC VIDEO: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' at Columbia University
- U.S. Stocks Slip, Dollar Rises
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Smallest US Businesses Borrowing Again: PayNet
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- US Job Losses to Bottom out Next Quarter: NABE
- Little Sign of Inflation on the Horizon: IMF
- Kraft Weighs Higher Cadbury Bid as Rivals Circle
- MBS Program Should be Extended: Fed's Bullard
- Warren Buffett, Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' At Columbia
- Microsoft, News Corp Weigh Online News Pact
- Senate Democrats at Odds Over Health Care Bill
RSS FEED
Tech Check
![]() |
Paul Sakuma / AP Intel's headquarters in Santa Clara, California. |
However, an Intel source tells me that Bloomberg did not obtain an "internal memo" of any kind because there wasn't one. Instead, the comments may have come from a transcript of a Q&A session with employees and Intel CEO Paul Otellini following last week's quarterly earnings report. This source says, to draw the conclusion from that exchange that Intel is projecting a first quarter loss is a "stretch."
This source said that there is no way (CEO Otellini) would tell employees what he hadn't already publicly stated about the company's forecast, particularly to Wall Street analysts.
Intel officially does not comment on internal employee communications and that's where the company believes the Bloomberg story may have come from.
Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy tells me: "We never forecast profitability. We did forecast a very uncertain first quarter. We deferred a revenue forecast because we simply didn't have enough information about what the market will do."
Bloomberg reported that Intel may be on the verge of breaking a 21-year streak of profitability, and would follow the 90 percent plunge in fourth-quarter profits that the company reported last week. Bloomberg quoted Otellini as saying it was "too close to call" whether the company might swing to a loss in the current quarter.
The Intel source said that it was indeed too close to call, but that to surmise that a loss was imminent, or that a loss was somehow more probable than a profit was simply too much of a stretch.
The Bloomberg story eclipsed the positive news reported by IBM, which had the company's $3.28 profit per share soundly beating the $3.03 expected, despite its $27 billion missing revenue expectations. The $17.2 billion in services bookings, 47.3 percent gross margin, and strong software sales figures all buoyed expectations that tech might be staging a comeback. The full-year EPS expectation jumped to $9.20 a share, far ahead of the recently lowered $8.75 IBM [IBM
Loading...
()
] was anticipating.
The Intel news may weigh heavily on investors Wednesday as the prepare for more tech earnings from Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
] and eBay [EBAY
Loading...
()
].
Questions? Comments?








