- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
- HP's Shot Across Cisco's Bow
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Existing-Home Sales Jump To Highest Level in 2-1/2 Years
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- Start-Up Proves Everything Really Is Better With Bacon
- TV Retailer QVC Joins 'Black Friday' Frenzy
- Buffett's Wealth and Fame Hasn't Helped 'Warren' As a Name
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Madoff—The Holiday Drink
- China Asks Its Banks to Slow Down
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- Rally Could 'Have Some Legs in 2010': Market Strategist
- Investors May Skew Housing Reality
- Buffett's Wealth and Fame Hasn't Helped 'Warren' As a Name
- Are Crazy Retail Deals Good for Business?
- Expect a 'Square Root-Shaped' Recovery: Chief Investor
- Madoff—The Holiday Drink
- HP to Feed on Enterprise Spending Next Year: Tech Analyst
- Bear, Lehman Execs Weren't Wiped Out by Crisis: Study
- How Real Estate Investors Skew Housing's Reality
- Wall Street 'Bonuses' Disappearing—but Only in Name
- Even Buffett's Huge Fame Can't Help the Name 'Warren'
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- JPMorgan's Dimon Could Succeed Geithner: Report
- Maria Blog: Are Crazy Retail Deals Good for Business?
- Treasury Auction of $44 Billion Gets Good Response
- Suze Orman’s 'A Healthier, Wealthier You'
RSS FEED
Tech Check
![]() |
Courtesy of Apple IPhone 3G |
So you'd think that he would be taking a kind of victory lap in the wake of yesterday's stellar earnings news from Apple that had the company soar past EPS and revenue expectations, celebrating its first $10 billion quarter, and very strong Mac and iPod sales.
Nah.
Gene Munster instead is disappointed in the company's iPhone sales in December ("No hiding behind that," he tells me) and he has dramatically taken down his fiscal 2010 earnings per share expectations because of what he says he has learned about Apple's iPhone refresh cycle, or when the company plans to introduce new versions of the handset.
In fact, he has taken down his EPS targets so much that many of you have written to me asking if it's true, that Munster went from $7.73 to $5.46. That's dramatic when you consider that Apple earned $5.36 in its fiscal 2008.
And that's led Munster to bring his target on Apple shares [AAPL
Loading...
()
] down to earth from $235 to $180.
So what happened? Well, I just got off the phone with Munster, and while he's disappointed, he's hardly disillusioned.
"We cut our estimates on iPhone, but it's more of a shift. The expectations of having a March launch of a new form factor looks less likely." He spoke to a manufacturing source in Asia which says new components will be delivered to Apple in late March or early April which means a new phone might not come until June. Gene was expecting that new phone in March. So, "We pulled the plug on our 45 million unit sales estimate for (calendar) 2009. There's just no way without that March release." His new calendar 2009 estimate is 28 million iPhone units. In 2010, he ups the figure by around 15 percent to 32 million.
All Them Apples
- Apple Takes Shot Across Palm's Bow
- Apple's Conference Call: The Live Blog
- One Take On The SEC Inquiry Into Apple Worth Reading
So that's the reason for such a significant revision in EPS estimates. No big recession or depression. Just the reality that the iPhone refresh cycle slid further into 2009 than he originally anticipated.
He also tells me he was "Definitely disappointed with the iPhone December number of 4.4 million" that Apple reported yesterday.
One other thing, he says: "We think they're going to a June refresh cycle on the iPhone, like they do with the September refresh for iPod."
So yeah, for all of you say-it-ain't-so's out there questioning whether Gene Munster really took his estimates down so significantly on Apple for fiscal 2010, it's "so." And those are the reasons why.
Questions? Comments?








