FEATURED SLIDESHOW
Who Is The Worst CEO?Mad Money needed new inductees for its
Wall of Shame, so we asked viewers for
nominations.
RECENT POSTS
- 4 Enemies of Bull Markets
- Experiencing Technical Difficulty?
- The Importance of Good Breadth
- How Big Money Rules the Markets
- Follow the Leader
- Mad Mail: Chesapeake Energy Is Hiring?
- Lightning Round: Royal Dutch Shell, Bank of America, RF Micro Devices and More
- Lightning Round OT: Harley-Davidson, Heartland Payment and More
- Cramer’s Christmas List
- Cramer: This Stock Offers ‘Plenty of Upside’
MAD MONEY FEATURES
PODCASTSWatch the Lightning Round whenever and wherever you want.
FULL SHOWSMissed an episode of Mad Money? Watch the lastest show here.
OFFICIAL MAD MONEY WIDGETGrab this all-in-one application and get recaps of the show sent right to your desktop or blog.
CRAMER'S SOUNDBOARDAdmit it: You’ve always wanted to hit the “They know nothing!” button. Here’s your chance.
CRAMER QUICK PICSCheck out the Mad Money host on set, back to school, behind the scenes and more.
VIDEOSGet all your favorite Cramer clips right here.
SHOP FOR MAD MERCHANDISEBuy Cramer books, bobbleheads and other Mad Money merchandise.
RING TONESPick up the phone! It’s Cramer! New Mad Money sounds for your cell phone.
TEXT MESSAGE ALERTMad Money’s mobile. Get show highlights sent to your phone.
Text Size 
 |
A deeper look at the indices showed that one-third of S&P 500 stocks finished January higher, as did a third of the S&P Mid-Cap 400, some quite substantially. Palm [PALM
Loading...
()
] added 150% to its share price, while Shaw Group [SGR
Loading...
()
] jumped 36% and Morgan Stanley [MS
Loading...
()
] 26%. Google registered a double-digit gain, too.
And this is just a small sampling from the list of companies that thrived during the worst January in history. Walgreen [WAG
Loading...
()
] and Wyeth [WYE
Loading...
()
], Symantec [SYMC
Loading...
()
] and Sallie Mae [SLM
Loading...
()
], Peabody Energy [BTU
Loading...
()
], National Oilwell Varco [NOC
Loading...
()
], Monsanto [MON
Loading...
()
] and many more returned profits to their shareholders.
Cramer’s point? There’s always a bull market somewhere. And if not an entire market, then at least some stocks. So don’t take your cue from the averages. They’ll blind you to opportunity.
This isn’t, of course, an endorsement of the present market. Cramer’s not a fan. He wants you playing defense with high-yielding and recession-resistant stocks. Think BP [BP
Loading...
()
], Tupperware Brands [TUP
Loading...
()
], Kraft Foods [KFT
Loading...
()
]. Watch UPS [UPS
Loading...
()
], Emerson [EMR
Loading...
()
] and Clorox [CLX
Loading...
()
], too. Poor quarterly reports might knock these names down enough to bring their dividend yields up. And Cramer’s all about accidental high yields right now.
Everyone is going to have to focus on preserving capital until we find some stability in the markets, and the economy. There’s been a lot of talk about President Obama’s good bank/bad bank plan, which would set up a federal institution similar the Resolution Trust Corp. used during the savings-and-loan crisis to help ailing financials, but concerns about the plan’s details pushed stocks down on Friday. There is, though, still a good chance that we’ll get an updated version of the RTC, so investors need a strategy if that happens.
Rule number one: If the word “nationalize” is mentioned, say in regard to Bank of America [BAC
Loading...
()
] or Citigroup [C
Loading...
()
], expect more bad months to come, Cramer said. The government should be helping, not managing, these banks.
The Mad Money host went so far as to say that Washington should take a “forbearance” approach to this problem, looking the other way while doling out cash. Give banks the money they need to get on their feet, and let them renegotiate the loans that are so badly hurting their balance sheets. In exchange, the government gets a promissory note of sorts, a guarantee that the money will be returned. Only if some firms couldn’t pay it back would the good bank/bad bank plan then be put to use. Defaulting banks’ assets would be seized immediately and their healthy assets sold to good banks like JPMorgan Chase [JPM
Loading...
()
] and Wells Fargo [WFC
Loading...
()
].
As for the bad assets, those toxic collateralized debt obligations at the center of this credit crisis, Cramer pointed to his earlier idea of a government-sponsored trading desk. The desk would bring together buyers and sellers, who right now are unwilling to budge on price due to fear of being stuck with worthless paper. The government would buy from one side at a reasonable price and sell to the other at a slight profit. That way a value could finally be put on these CDOs, holders of them wouldn’t get hit with such a big loss and those who want the paper would see there’s less risk in the market.
Why does Cramer think this will work? Because this is exactly how we emerged from the savings-and-loan crisis. Excluding the trading-desk idea, that is, which is his alone. So he’s convinced it would work. In the meantime, though, keep playing defense.
Cramer's charitable BP, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo.
Questions for Cramer?
Questions, comments, suggestions for the Mad Money website?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes