- For Stocks, Treasury Plan 'May Be a Game-Changer'
- Fed, Treasury Announce Measures On Financial Stability
- Deutsche Bank Expects Return to Profit This Year
- Obama Urges G20 Leaders to Act Fast to Boost Growth
- BofA Investor Files to Strip CEO of Chairman Job
- Goldman Sachs May Sell Its Stock In China Bank ICBC
- AIG and Hank Greenberg: Revenge of the Patriarch
- More Madoff Assets Found, US-UK Probe Linked
- Nine of Top 10 AIG Bonuses Returned: Cuomo
- Cramer’s Favorite Tanker: Nordic American
- Lightning Round: Quanta Services, Hershey, Chimera and More
- Lightning Round OT: GM, Con Ed and More
- Praise for the President
- Trust in Dividends: Air Products
- Cramer: 10 Stocks to Watch
- Berkshire Hathaway Back at $90K After 28% Rally Over 12 Days
- Your First Move For Tuesday March 24th
- Web Extra: Fast & Furious Trades For Tuesday
Senator Christopher Dodd’s executive compensation amendment is having unintended consequences that are damaging the very banks Congress is supposedly trying to help.
Follow me here.
As part of Senator Dodd’s last-minute amendment about executive compensation, he put in a provision making it easier for the banks to pay back the TARP money to the government.
This is directly from the bill signed into law:
“…the Secretary shall permit a TARP recipient to repay any assistance previously provided under the TARP without regard to whether the financial institution has replaced such funds from any other source…”
Under the old TARP rules, a bank could only give the money back after it had replaced it with other capital, presumably raised from private investors. With the above words, that requirement is gone.
Now, here's where the unintended consequences start to play out. On Friday, Standard & Poor’s said the Dodd provision changes the way they view the QUALITY of TARP money. The credit rating agency, which determines the ratings on the banks and decides whether a bank lives or dies, says the provision means that capital is on no longer "permanent" in their eyes. That's crucial because, as a result, they are no longer going to use it when determining certain capital ratios, which help them determine their ratings on banks.
Banks have to maintain a certain amount of capital to make sure they can cover any losses they have from bad loans. If they don't, regulators can shut them down, or, at a minimum, they face downgrades by the ratings agencies. If they are downgraded, their borrowing costs go up. If their borrowing costs rise enough, they can no longer stay in business.
In other words, as a result of Dodd’s ammedment, banks will have a tougher time convincing the ratings agencies they are in good financial health. I can't imagine that's what he intended, but that's the problem with government intervention: it causes painful results no one wanted, but now we all have to live with them.
Citigroup [C
Loading...
()
], Bank of America [BAC
Loading...
()
], Wells Fargo [WFC
Loading...
()
], Goldman Sachs [GS
Loading...
()
], Morgan Stanley [BOI
Loading...
()
], are just some of the banks that have recieved this government money.









