SPECIAL REPORT
MOST SHARED
- How Boaz Weinstein and Hedge Funds Outsmarted JPMorgan
- Marc Faber: 100% Chance of Global Recession
- As Bank Loans Dry Up in Spain, Small and Medium Businesses Fight for Life
- How Nasdaq Lost Control of Facebook IPO, by the Minute
- RIM May Cut at Least 2,000 Jobs in Restructuring: Report
- JPMorgan Trading Loss: Did Regulators Miss the Risk?
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- How Nasdaq Lost Control of Facebook IPO, by the Minute
- Week Ahead: Europe Has Wall Street Bull on Short Leash
- Pro-Bailout Greeks Regain Lead in Polls Before Vote
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- RIM May Cut at Least 2,000 Jobs in Restructuring: Report
- EU Finalizes Bank Reforms; Shifts Burden to Bondholders
- Spain's Bankia Eyes Stake Sales After Record Bailout
- EU Set to Launch Action Against China Over Telecom Aid
RSS FEED
Pharma's Market
Pfizer's Unlucky 13-Year Milestone
![]() |
AP |
February 2009. This year will mark my ninth anniversary (man, time flies) at CNBC. And today PFE hit a new intra-day low of $12.90.
I don't see any news. But "The New York Times" today did a story on the latest Wall Street parlor game — trying to figure out the next big pharma-big pharma mega-merger in the wake of the PFE-Wyeth [WYE
Loading...
()
] deal. The article mentions how Pfizer's stock had lost about a quarter of its value since it announced the acquisition and how that might cause other big drug companies to think twice before pulling the trigger.
As I blogged yesterday, Pfizer has given up on three drugs in late-stage development in as many weeks. That always expensive, risky business is one of the driving forces behind the Wyeth deal. The post prompted a couple of readers to write in with their thoughts on the situation.
Pharma's Market Comments: |

JoAnne Patterson emailed, "I've been in the industry for 30 years and I have been saying for a loooooooong (her emphasis) time that the only way any of these big pharma companies are going to survive in the 21st century is to completely change their marketing practices and cut most of the ridiculously wasteful marketing and sales expenses."
Coincidentally, a report came out today on that very issue.
And Thomas Lambach said, "As a long suffering PFE stockholder I conclude their Board is asleep or incompetent. The pipeline issue was known years ago yet the Board accepted the CEO's (Hank McKinnell's) sweet talk, for years, before bribing him to just go away. They should have fired him! That's why I say the Board is asleep. Now they want (again) to just buy their way out of PFE's problems—by acquiring WYE. Easy way out, especially if one's using OPM! After many years I'm thinking 'sell' PFE." McKinnell got a big golden parachute. OPM, BTW, stand for other people's money.
Mr. Lambach, apparently you're not alone.
Questions? Comments?










