FEATURED SLIDESHOW
Who Is The Worst CEO?Mad Money needed new inductees for its
Wall of Shame, so we asked viewers for
nominations.
RECENT POSTS
- Mad Mail: Chesapeake Energy Is Hiring?
- Lightning Round: Royal Dutch Shell, Bank of America, RF Micro Devices and More
- Lightning Round OT: Harley-Davidson, Heartland Payment and More
- Cramer’s Christmas List
- Cramer: This Stock Offers ‘Plenty of Upside’
- Cramer Cuts Through Bears' Bull to Explain Tuesday's Market
- Cramer: Buy These 2 Dividend Plays
- Remorseful Regulator Leads Reform Fight
- Lightning Round: AT&T, Verizon, Novartis and More
- Lightning Round OT: Alcoa, Weight Watchers and More
MAD MONEY FEATURES
PODCASTSWatch the Lightning Round whenever and wherever you want.
OFFICIAL MAD MONEY WIDGETGrab this all-in-one application and get recaps of the show sent right to your desktop or blog.
CRAMERS SOUNDBOARDAdmit it: You've always wanted to hit the "They
know nothing!" button. Here’s your chance.
CHECK OUT OUR PHOTOSCheck out Cramer on set, back to school, behind the scenes and more.
SHOP FOR MAD MERCHANDISEBuy Cramer books, bobbleheads and other Mad Money merchandise.
RING TONESPick up the phone! It's Cramer! New Mad Money sounds for your cell phone.
TEXT MESSAGE ALERTMad Money's mobile. Get show highlights sent to your phone.
Text Size 
Dividends might be the best indicator of a company’s strength in this market, Cramer said Tuesday. Or, more to the point, a company’s ability to either raise that payout or maintain it at all. In an environment where earnings estimates can’t be trusted to value stocks, a continued focus on rewarding shareholders might be the next best thing.
The logic is simple enough: A company won’t raise its dividend if management sees trouble on the horizon. And as we’ve seen many times recently, cutting the dividend to preserve capital is often the first life-saving measure a company takes. So when a company instead shows that it is committed to the payout, investors can take that as a bullish sign.
On Monday, Cramer highlighted Air Products [APD
Loading...
()
] because it had just raised its dividend. For today’s show, he turned the spotlight on Procter & Gamble [PG
Loading...
()
] because, in the very least, it has the ability to. The stock may be down $20 from its high, but P&G has raised its dividend for 52 consecutive years. Cramer doesn't think 2009 will be any different.
Sure, the dividend yield is a mere 3.3%, but it’s the underlying business that is most important. This, after all, is why P&G is capable of giving back more to shareholders. Procter gets 61% of its sales from overseas, so the declining U.S. dollar is a big plus for the company. International revenues will translate into more profits here at home. This couldn’t come at a better time because sales actually declined last quarter because of the strong dollar’s impact.
Lower commodity and energy costs are another plus for Procter. Wider margins equal bigger profits. The company also has been able to pass 75% of its costs onto consumers, and they won’t rescind those increases just because oil is down. They’ll pocket the difference.
Another noteworthy fact: Five of the top 10 new products in the U.S. during 2008 came from P&G. They innovate to thrive and use that ingenuity to stay in the game when consumers are trading down to cheaper brands. In fact, they’ve also played the trade-down game by offering less expensive versions of their own brands.
Cramer fully expects Procter & Gamble to boost its dividend, as it always has. In the meantime, P&G buyers have the chance to capture some upside. The stock has traded at about 15 times earnings between 2000 and 2007, but now trades at 11. With the rest of the cohort trading at about 14, P&G could jump 23% if it catches up.
Questions for Cramer?
Questions, comments, suggestions for the Mad Money website?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes