Millennial Money
BIO
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Why Amazon Rules Retail
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- JAL Slides to Record Low on Bankruptcy Jitters
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- Prepare For Large Decline In Stocks, Next Year?
- Hewlett-Packard Profit Rises, Matches Guidance
- The Social Media Gaming Threat
- Holiday Travel Outlook
- Remorseful Regulator Leads Reform Fight
- Lightning Round: AT&T, Verizon, Novartis and More
- Lightning Round OT: Alcoa, Weight Watchers and More
- Why Amazon Rules Retail
- Nordic American: Sinking Ship or Titan Tanker?
- Your First Move For Tuesday November 24th
- Cramer: What Monday’s Housing Number Really Means
- Pops & Drops: Cigna, Verizon...
- Giving Thanks: Energy
- Web Extra: Winning The Chocolate Wars
RSS FEED
Senior Writer, Mad Money
![]() |
Via Brad DeLong I read a great little excerpt from a Kevin Carey piece in The Chronicle of Higher Education, which you and I can't read unless we dish out a 10-spot for the web pass (not gonna happen), about how the internet should kill off colleges the same way it's killing off the printed newspaper:
"Some people will argue that the best traditional college courses are superior to any online offering, and they're often right. There is no substitute for a live teacher and student, meeting minds. But remember, that's far from the experience of the lower-division undergraduate.... All she's getting is a live version of what iTunes University offers.... She's also increasingly paying through the nose for the privilege.... Perhaps the higher-education fuse is 25 years long, perhaps 40. But it ends someday, in our lifetimes. There's still time for higher-education institutions to use technology to their advantage, to move to a more-sustainable cost structure, and to win customers with a combination of superior service and reasonable price. If they don't, then someday, sooner than we think, we're going to be reading about the demise of once-great universities — not in the newspaper, but in whatever comes next..."
In some ways I would love to see that happen. The four years we spend at college really are a waste of time, at least from the standpoint of education and productivity. We don't learn anything we couldn't learn by buying a few books, and we're totally unproductive.
Bad for society.
On the other hand, it's great for students. The four years we're supposed to spend in College are four years where we basically get to screw around, do a little homework, and in the end emerge with a piece of paper that lets us earn higher wages than if we hadn't gone.
The internet certainly should kill colleges and universities from an educational standpoint. But that's assuming they're about education, and you know what they say about assumptions. I doubt going to school was ever about learning, and if it was, that certainly stopped the moment Gutenberg got that whole movable type thing figured out. For young people, it's about the credentials, stupid.
As long as we, as a culture, continue to believe that a bachelor's degree is a sine qua non for getting a white-collar job, people will keep getting them. Plus it gives us valuable time to hide from the real world, something some people choose to do permanently by becoming academics.
Questions? Comments? Send them to
- The show attracts a big TV audience every year, but this year it may take on even more importance.
- …you'll want to be prepared. Tips for getting the most out of the post-Thanksgiving shopping frenzy.
- Congressman Ron Paul explains to Squawk Box why he’s pushing legislation to audit the Federal Reserve.
- CNBC’s Phil LeBeau took a test drive of GM’s flagship electric car. Here’s what he thought of the Volt.
- The energy company Power Efficiency is building tools that regulate the power electric motors use.
- CNBC’s technology reporter Jim Goldman guides you through the best gadgets to buy this holiday season.











