- Facebook's Biggest-Ever Holiday Shopping Season
- Facebook's New Dual Class Structure - Slow Steps to an IPO
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
- Facebook's Biggest-Ever Holiday Shopping Season
- Facebook's New Dual Class Structure - Slow Steps to an IPO
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- The Executive Job Search
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- Activision Prepares to Double Dip on ‘Modern Warfare 2’
- US Mint to Suspend American Eagle Gold 1-Ounce Coins
- Salvation Army's Kettles Now Credit Card-Ready
- Foreign Demand Boosts US 7-Year Treasury Sale
- Black Friday: Can Banks Tap the Frenzy, Too?
- Oil Friday
- 4 Thanksgiving Week Buys For Your Portfolio: Market Pros
- There's a 'Great Chance' For a Double-Dip Recession: Strategist
- Revenge of the Gangsta Nerds
- Will TCU See The "Flutie Effect?"
- Retail Earnings and Sales to Improve in Q4: Analyst
- Consumers Catching the Holiday Spirit
- It's Beginning To Look A Lot More Riskless
- Crescenzi: Claims Level Suggests End to Job Losses
- Hedge Funds Take Early Lead in Warren Buffett's 'Big Bet'
- Bankruptcies Jump, Hitting Highest Level in Four Years
- AIG, Ex-CEO Greenberg Reach Pact to Settle Disputes
- Bank of America CEO Search May Extend Into 2010
- Steepest Black Friday Discounts, Revealed
- 'Cancer of Fraud' Permeates Health Care System: Critics
- US Mint to Suspend American Eagle Gold 1-Ounce Coins
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- For Many in US, It Will Be a Scaled-Down Holiday Season
Media Money
Score one for the F.C.C. The Federal Communications Commission just got the Supreme Court in its camp in its attempt to regulate cursing on television.
The issue at hand is the FCC's "fleeting expletives" policy, which would charge broadcasters fines for even one four-letter word on live T.V. The policy was implemented in 2004 after U2's Bono dropped an F-bomb during the Golden Globes. The FCC also has more stringent definition of an "indecent word" to include anything involving sex and excrement.
The highest court voted (5-4) Tuesday to refuse to pass judgment on whether the policy violates First Amendment free speech rights, passing the issue to a federal appeals court to weigh whether or not the policy is constitutional. The key to today's news is the fact that it throws out a New York Appeals court ruling that found in favor of a Fox TV challenge to FCC policy about swearing slip-ups from Cher and Nicole Richie at the Billboard Music Awards in 2002 and 2003.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens, who dissented along with the two other liberal judges, raised serious constitutional concerns that the ruling disregards the context of how words are used. Often, if not most of the time, the two big curse words are used as exclamations, with no contextual reference to sex or excrement. For Ginsburg and Stevens, context matters.
Truth is, despite the crackdown, the F.C.C.'s power is waning. The regulatory body only oversees broadcast TV and radio, but these days tens of millions of Americans have cable and Satellite TV, let alone all the content that's accessible online. The average U.S. home receives over 100 channels, and only a handful of them are regulated.
It seems that as the FCC loses control over a growing percent of the content Americans consume, it's more determined to make sure those four broadcast channels are squeaky clean. But the broadcast nets will continue to host live celebrity-studded events, and starlets have been known to curse. So unless the federal appeals court rules differently, the four major broadcast nets will continue to pay the FCC the equivalent of a mouth washed out with soap.
Questions? Comments?







