Skip navigation

Millennial Money

BIO

Cliff Mason is the author of Millennial Money. He is the Senior Writer of CNBC's Mad Money with Jim Cramer, and has been that program's primary writer, in cooperation with and under the supervision of Jim Cramer, since he began at CNBC as an intern during the summer of 2005. Mason was the author of a column at TheStreet.com during 2007, which he describes as "hilarious, if short-lived." He graduated from Harvard College in 2007. It was at Harvard that Mason learned to multi-task, mastering the art of seeming to pay attention to professors while writing scripts for Mad Money. Mason has co-written two books with Jim Cramer: Jim Cramer's Mad Money: Watch TV, Get Rich and Stay Mad For Life: Get Rich, Stay Rich (Make Your Kids Even Richer). He is 100% responsible for any parts of either book that you did not like. Mason has also had a fruitful relationship with Jim Cramer as his nephew for the last 23 years and will hopefully continue to hold that position for many more as long as he doesn't do anything to get himself kicked out of the family.


Current DateTime: 08:02:44 12 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 26202094

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 08:02:45 12 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30213010
powered by digg
Why Is The White House Worrying About Executive Pay?
Published: Thursday, 14 May 2009 | 11:19 AM ET
Text Size
By: Cliff Mason
Senior Writer, Mad Money

Of all the possible things that Congress and the Obama administration could waste their time fiddling with, why did they have to pick executive pay?

I'm not someone who believes that limiting or "restructuring" compensation for executives will do any real harm. My problem is that it's an almost entirely symbolic and irrelevant issue.

Nothing they "accomplish" on this front will matter. In the process, though, they will upset a lot of libertarian types, and get all the class warriors focused on an issue that has nothing to do with their day-to-day lives. To paraphrase Talleyrand, it's worse than a crime, it's a mistake.

Whenever our policy-makers start dealing with compensation, it's always a huge distraction. For some reason, everybody has a strong opinion on this one, despite the fact that it only applies to a tiny fragment of the population.

The administration says it wants to try and restructure executive compensation to prevent banks from taking on excessive risk. Sure, there's a lot of room for improvement in the current system. But aren't there also like a trillion more effective ways to regulate risk? Perhaps they could try some methods that don't involve getting people riled up about supposed questions of principle?

I don't care if the government ultimately ends up instituting some kind of de facto pay cap for banking executives. The idea that these companies won't be able to retain talent has lost a most of its intellectual heft over the last couple of years. It seems to me the banks could do a lot better without all of that "talent." Besides, it's not like there are other industries or other countries where the pay would be better. What are our banking executives going to do, move to Europe? I thought that was practically a four letter word for these fat cats.

And at the end of the day, the entire argument against limiting executive pay is based on economics, which ought to be the single most discredited discipline out there, one that's made no progress in the last 70 odd years. But now that the administration and its allies in Congress have hit the execution compensation nerve, you just know we're going to have to hear endless arguments about the wonders of the free market and the need to remain competitive.

Our legislators should really stick to what they're good at and go back to testing baseball players for steroids. As for the administration, I thought they were smarter than this. Unlike Congress, I know Obama and his team have the ability to learn and they don't seem to care so much about grandstanding. I would cross my fingers in the hope that they'll get over this quickly, but I'm too busy sticking them in my ears so I won't have to listen to anyone argue about fairness or equality.

Questions? Comments?  Send them to

© 2009 CNBC.com
Add This share icon
Text Size
  • digg share

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

  • Billboard allows music lovers to watch concerts for free online, with five different camera angles.
  • US real estate prices have fallen dramatically, but some places are still doing well. See the best-performing zip codes this year.
  • An Italian cashmere maker aims to make profits while creating ideal conditions for his workers.
  • Just in time for the holidays, the Triumph company of Japan offers the latest innovation in women’s undergarments.
  • Vote and suggest your own, and remember--there's a fine line between a hero and a zero.
  • Health Care
  • The NYT explains what the Senate needs to do to improve cost and quality in U.S. health care.
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 06:21:11 12 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:01:49 12 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 01:01:49 12 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:01:49 12 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters