Millennial Money
BIO
MOST SHARED
- Herbalife Vs. Hedge Funds
- Apple Surpasses Nokia as Top Cellphone Maker by Profits
- AIG CEO Ready to Quit over Pay Constraints: Report
- China Factory Output Leaps to 19-Month Highs
- Toll Brothers: More Contracts Signed, but Sales Down
- Three Things the US Can Do To Stop the Dollar's Decline
- America Is On Sale
- Cramer Jeers J&J, Applauds Abbott
- Your First Move For Wednesday November 10th
- Lightning Round: Priceline.com, Citigroup, Transocean and More
- Web Extra: The Best Trades In Tech
- Lightning Round OT: STEC, ICICI Bank and More
- Pops & Drops: UPS, Electronic Arts...
- Herbalife Vs. Hedge Funds
- Cramer Jeers J&J, Applauds Abbott
- Cramer: In This Relay-Race Market, Who Gets Baton Next?
- Take Your Position: Retail Earnings
- The Return of Dividend Investing?
RSS FEED
Senior Writer, Mad Money
![]() |
Here's the latest from the front in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal, "employees in their 20s and 30s are finding themselves more at risk of a layoff, according to labor lawyers, as employers look to avoid age- discrimination lawsuits by adopting a "last one in, first one out" policy and turn to tenure as a means of conducting layoffs".
Okay, let me get this straight. Companies are firing younger workers because the legal system is stacked against us now? That's what this means, don't kid yourself about a level playing field.
If companies are more likely to be successfully sued by older workers when they enact "headcount reduction" plans, even though you can probably find someone younger to take the same job for less pay, something is very, very wrong.
This is so screwed up I'm having trouble getting my brain around it. Because older workers are paid more, then companies that want to save money but fear the wrath of the legal system, will have to lay off more total employees than they otherwise would.
Here's a thought for any corporation that's still in the business of capitalism: if you want to achieve cost savings by cutting back on your workforce, get rid of the people with "seniority." You won't have to fire as many because on average they have higher salaries than younger workers. And, let's be honest, if these are white collar jobs that involve computers, why the heck do you have anyone over 30 working for you in the first place? People who are still trying to figure out how to use the Xerox [XRX
Loading...
()
] machine do not belong in front of a keyboard, unless it's the keyboard of a typewriter.
Of course, old judges, along with juries made up of people who skew older, are more likely to side with their fellow-fogies (as are the people who probably design these, "fire the kids" policies), so maybe you'll lose lots of money in court and have reinstate some of the older workers you tried to fire.
Unbelievable. I am playing the age card. This is age discrimination. I don't even really care that it's not fair, what bothers me is that it's so stupid and craven.
Do you Agree/Disagree? Send your comments to
- Vote and suggest your own, and remember--there's a fine line between a hero and a zero.
- If you are lucky enough to have money and the time, this is a great time to see America, says CNBC's Jane Wells.
- What’s powering your microwave, fridge and computer? Part of it is fuel from Russian nuclear weapons. The NYT reports.
- One author sees lessons for you in Disney’s recent Makeover of Mickey Mouse: “Nice” doesn’t always win.
- With 123 years of history, slogans and commercials, Coca-Cola is the most recognized brand on earth.
- The opening of a virtual pet store in “World of Warcraft” could prove a cash bonanza for Activision-Blizzard.












