Skip navigation


Current DateTime: 03:03:12 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24355697

FEATURED QUIZZES


Current DateTime: 03:03:13 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 33793611

Current DateTime: 02:57:36 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24890560
  • Winterizing Your Portfolio

      If 2009 was the winter of our discontent, will 2010 be a winter wonderland for investors? A lot depends on the recovery—or lack thereof.

  • Investor's Guide to Real Estate

      Some even say the long-awaited recovery is here. Regardless, buyers and sellers alike can profit from our guide.

  • Alternative Investing

      Stocks and bonds? Sure. But it's a big world out there for investors.

powered by digg
An Adviser (Mine) Is Charged With Fraud
By: Ron Lieber, The New York Times | 11 Jun 2009 | 10:28 AM ET
Text Size

About two months ago, I wrote a column about how Matthew Weitzman, our family’s financial planner, was under investigation for reportedly siphoning money from clients’ accounts.

Financial Advisor
Financial Advisor

Well, the ax finally fell on Wednesday. The Securities and Exchange Commission accused him of looting client accounts of at least $6 million and using them “as his personal piggy bank.” It accused him of spending the money he took on a multimillion-dollar home, luxury cars and a share in a horse. Mr. Weitzman agreed to settle the claims without admitting or denying the accusations, though the S.E.C. is unsure about how much money his clients will get back.

Meanwhile, the United States attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York, along with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, also unsealed charges against Mr. Weitzman. They include fraud, lying to investors and converting money for his own use. Some of the charges carry maximum penalties of 20 years in prison and a $5 million fine.

Mr. Weitzman declined to comment on the charges and hung up on me. His lawyer, Marc Mukasey, said he was reviewing the accusations and declined to comment further.

Sure, fraud happens. Yes, people steal. But the S.E.C. complaint paints a picture of a man set on aiming at the vulnerable. The complaint lists a roster of victims, including an elderly couple with compromised mental capabilities; a 24-year-old law student who had inherited $1 million from her parents; and Mr. Weitzman’s own father-in-law, who may be out $3 million.

Patricia Flinn, a Brewster, N.Y., resident and a former client of Mr. Weitzman’s, met him when her husband was told, six months after they had married, that he had cancer. “He told Matt that he wanted to be sure that his wife would be taken care of.”

As her husband, William Adcock, lay dying, however, Mr. Weitzman helped himself to Mr. Adcock’s money, including one withdrawal on the day that Mr. Weitzman served as a witness when Mr. Adcock changed his will, Ms. Flinn said. After he died, Mr. Weitzman began taking Ms. Flinn’s money instead, she recalled. According to the government charges, he usually used forms with forged signatures to wire money from client accounts at Charles Schwab [SCHW  Loading...      ()   ] to an account that he controlled.


Current DateTime: 03:03:12 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 22528754

A Schwab spokesman said it had intensive controls in place to prevent this problem, but declined to elaborate for fear of tipping off potential offenders.

Ms. Flinn said she did not notice the withdrawals until Schwab representatives and Mr. Weitzman’s former business partner alerted her to the problems. “I never opened my husband’s mail,” she said. “I was in the hospital every day for three months. I was preoccupied with Bill’s health.”

A few peers of Mr. Weitzman in the financial planning world have accused me of hammering away at this because of my personal involvement. They’ve got it wrong. The reason this is, in many ways, more important than the Bernard Madoff scheme is that Mr. Weitzman’s clients were merely upper middle class. You didn’t have to be famous or play golf at the right clubs to work with Mr. Weitzman.

More from CNBC.com

So most readers of this newspaper could be victims in other similar situations. I almost was. Your parents or grandparents might be vulnerable. It is hard to guard against outright theft or fraud, but you can at least read your statements carefully to watch out for it.

And if you have family members who are old, infirm or ill-informed, read the statements for them. The odds of someone trying to steal may well be highest when his victims are paying the least amount of attention.

If you know Mr. Weitzman, please get in touch with me at .

This story originally appeared in the The New York Times
Tools:
Print EmailAdd This share icon
  • digg share

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

  • Vote and suggest your own, and remember--there's a fine line between a hero and a zero.
  • If you are lucky enough to have money and the time, this is a great time to see America, says CNBC's Jane Wells.
  • What’s powering your microwave, fridge and computer? Part of it is fuel from Russian nuclear weapons. The NYT reports.
  • Mickey Mouse
  • One author sees lessons for you in Disney’s recent Makeover of Mickey Mouse: “Nice” doesn’t always win.
  • With 123 years of history, slogans and commercials, Coca-Cola is the most recognized brand on earth.
  • The opening of a virtual pet store in “World of Warcraft” could prove a cash bonanza for Activision-Blizzard.
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:40:19 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:02:04 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 02:13:25 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:02:04 11 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters