|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Official Says China Hopes for Forex Diversification
- Stimulus Is a Small Patch for a Very Big Economic Hole
- Australia Trade Gap Widens as Commodity Prices Fall
- Obama Pushes ahead with Transport Fund Rescue
- Michael Jackson's Will Could Trigger Fight Over Estate
- Will Sobering Jobs Number Move Stocks, Thursday?
- Google to Take Ad Know-How to TV, Mobile Phones: CEO
- Schwarzenegger Says California In Fiscal Emergency
- Best-Selling Fourth of July Fireworks
- Oil Outlook for the Second Half
- Bowyer: Why Isn't America Hiring?
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- FDA: Thinking Outside The Black Box
- Ford Passes Toyota For #2 In The U.S.
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Stock Strategies for the '7th Inning'
- Singh Not Wearing Stanford At Tournament
- Companies Behind Murray Have a Lot To Gain
![]() |
R. Allen Stanford |
The Texas law firm Baker Botts is denying it helped Texas Financier Allen Stanford create the financial empire that the firm is now helping dismantle.
The SEC sued Stanford in February alleging a massive Ponzi scheme, and a Dallas judge placed the firm in receivership. Dallas attorney Ralph Janvey is the court-appointed Receiver, and Baker Botts is one of his main law firms.
The firm has already billed millions of dollars in fees, and has been actively involved in closing Stanford's offices in an effort to preserve assets for investors. But according to the filing by Stanford's attorneys, Baker Botts helped create Stanford's offshore bank in the 1980s, and as a result has a conflict of interest.
Authorities allege that bank, which started as Guardian International Bank in Montserrat and later became Stanford International Bank in Antigua, was at the heart of Stanford's alleged Ponzi scheme. The bank issued billions of dollars in certificates of deposit, which the Securities and Exchange Commission says were bogus.
In a statement Wednesday, a spokesperson for Baker Botts said the company has no record of ever representing Stanford, Guardian International Bank or Stanford International Bank.
The bank did admit to working with a related party about banking in the Carribbean from October 1985 to February 1986, but that work involved two meetings, 5.5 hours of time and an $850 fee. The associate involved in this work and his supervisor both left the firm many years ago, the statement said.
"The prior work bears no relationship to the work we are doing for the Reciever and that we do not have a conflict of interest," the statement said.
If a court agrees to disqualify the firm, it could throw a major wrench into the receivership, which is supposed to be locating Stanford's assets and returning them to investors.
It also could have implications in an eventual criminal trial of Stanford, since the filing seeks to block the firm from testifying against Stanford. Thus far, the 59-year old financier has not been charged criminally.
The court-appointed Receiver, Ralph Janvey, has been roundly criticized — not just by Stanford, who claims Janvey is destroying a legitimate business, but by Stanford's 28,000 investors whose funds have been frozen.
In the midst of all of that, Janvey has attempted to claim $20 million in fees and expenses, including the cost of hiring law firms like Baker Botts.
A spokesperson for Janvey had no immediate comment on the filing.









