Money & Politics
- An Interview with Tom Coburn
- President Zero Sum Goes to Asia
- Is Government-Run Health Care Going to Pass?
- The Congressional Assault on Fed Independence
- Addicted to Easy Money?
- A Red-Ink Train Wreck: The Real Fiscal Cost of Government-Run Healthcare
- A Short-Sighted Cheer for Easy Money
- Stocks and Voters Show GOP the Way
SHOW TIMES
Weeknights 7p ET
CNBC Asia:
Saturday 06:00 SIN/HK
Sunday 04:00 SIN/HK
CNBC Europe:
Monday - Friday 10:00 CET
Saturday 06:00 CET
Sunday 04:00 CET
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- Existing-Home Sales Jump To Highest Level in 2-1/2 Years
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Buffett's Wealth and Fame Hasn't Helped 'Warren' As a Name
- Hewlett-Packard Profit Rises, Matches Guidance
- Holiday Travel Outlook
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Madoff—The Holiday Drink
CONTACT US
We want To hear from you!
E-mail:
Anchor
It looks like President Obama’s big-bang health-care reform is going down to defeat. This is good.
But my question is why do we need it at all?
According to a recent ABC News/USA Today/Kaiser Family Foundation survey, 89 percent of Americans are satisfied with their health care. That could mean up to 250 million people are happy. So why is it that we need Obama’s big-bang health-care overhaul in the first place?
There’s more. According the U.S. Census Bureau, we don’t have 47 million folks who are truly uninsured. When you take college kids plus those earning $75,000 or more who chose not to sign up, that removes roughly 20 million people. Then take out about 10 million more who are not U.S. citizens, and 11 million who are eligible for SCHIP and Medicaid but have not signed up for some reason.
So that really leaves only 10 million to 15 million people who are truly long-term uninsured.
Yes, they need help. And yes, I would like to give it to them. But not with mandatory coverage, or new government-backed insurance plans, or massive tax increases. And certainly not with the Canadian-European-style nationalization that has always been the true goal of the Obama administration and congressional Democrats.
Instead, we can give the truly uninsured vouchers or debit cards that will allow for choice and coverage, and even health savings accounts for retirement wealth. According to expert Betsy McCaughey, instead of several trillion dollars and socialized medicine, this voucher approach would cost only about $25 billion a year.
But the Democratic agenda has never really been about just the uninsured. And it certainly hasn’t been about real cost-cutting or true market choice and competition. Nor has it been about tort/trial-lawyer reform. Instead, the Democratic agenda has always been a class-warfare, anti-business attack on private-sector doctors, hospitals, insurance firms, and drug companies. It’s all about control, knocking down their profits, and telling them what to do.
Because government planners know best, right? Wrong. Absolutely wrong.
Great Slideshows On CNBC.com Including:
- The World's Biggest Debtor Nations
- The Biggest Holders of US Government Debt
- A History of Government Spending
Questions? Comments, send your emails to:






