Skip navigation

Money & Politics

WEEKNIGHTS 7P ET

SHOW TIMES

CNBC US:
Weeknights 7p ET

CNBC Asia:
Saturday 06:00 SIN/HK
Sunday 04:00 SIN/HK

CNBC Europe:
Monday - Friday 10:00 CET
Saturday 06:00 CET
Sunday 04:00 CET

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 04:02:28 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 28775123

LATEST VIDEO

Get RSS Feed

» More

Current DateTime: 04:02:28 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 28776292

CONTACT US

Comments? Questions?
We want To hear from you!
E-mail:
We Don’t Need Obama’s Big-Bang Health-Care Plan
Published: Monday, 22 Jun 2009 | 12:36 PM ET
Text Size
By: Larry Kudlow
Anchor

It looks like President Obama’s big-bang health-care reform is going down to defeat. This is good.

But my question is why do we need it at all?

According to a recent ABC News/USA Today/Kaiser Family Foundation survey, 89 percent of Americans are satisfied with their health care. That could mean up to 250 million people are happy. So why is it that we need Obama’s big-bang health-care overhaul in the first place?

There’s more. According the U.S. Census Bureau, we don’t have 47 million folks who are truly uninsured. When you take college kids plus those earning $75,000 or more who chose not to sign up, that removes roughly 20 million people. Then take out about 10 million more who are not U.S. citizens, and 11 million who are eligible for SCHIP and Medicaid but have not signed up for some reason.

So that really leaves only 10 million to 15 million people who are truly long-term uninsured.

Yes, they need help. And yes, I would like to give it to them. But not with mandatory coverage, or new government-backed insurance plans, or massive tax increases. And certainly not with the Canadian-European-style nationalization that has always been the true goal of the Obama administration and congressional Democrats.

Instead, we can give the truly uninsured vouchers or debit cards that will allow for choice and coverage, and even health savings accounts for retirement wealth. According to expert Betsy McCaughey, instead of several trillion dollars and socialized medicine, this voucher approach would cost only about $25 billion a year.

But the Democratic agenda has never really been about just the uninsured. And it certainly hasn’t been about real cost-cutting or true market choice and competition. Nor has it been about tort/trial-lawyer reform. Instead, the Democratic agenda has always been a class-warfare, anti-business attack on private-sector doctors, hospitals, insurance firms, and drug companies. It’s all about control, knocking down their profits, and telling them what to do.

Because government planners know best, right? Wrong. Absolutely wrong.

Great Slideshows On CNBC.com Including:

Questions? Comments, send your emails to:

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Add This share icon
Text Size
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:14:48 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 10:08:24 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 10:23:55 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:08:16 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters