- Intel Profit, Outlook Both Top Expectations; Shares Leap
- Rio Detentions Complicate China Iron Ore Negotiations
- Democratic Healthcare Bill Calls for Tax Hikes, Mandates
- Faber Report: SEC Settles with Kozlowski—Finally
- 3 Hot Stocks In An Otherwise Tepid Market
- Madoff Begins Life Sentence at Prison in Butner, NC
- US to See Slow Recovery; Inflation a Threat: Hoenig
- Yum Brands Profit Tops Forecast, But Shares Fall
- Dollar Stores: Are You Getting What You Bargained For?
- Time Warner and Comcast's Web TV Venture Gains Partners
- Intel Blows Past Earnings
- Dollar Stores: Are You Getting What You Bargained For?
- Top Bank Stock Picks — and Pans: Strategists (Pt. 2)
- Top Bank Stock Picks — and Pans: Strategists (Pt. 1)
- Buy These Discount Store Stocks: Top Analyst
- Investment Strategies Now: Bull vs. Bear Picks
- 'Twittering' One's Thumbs During Bank Robbery
- Schork Oil Outlook: 'Oil Bulls are Hanging in There by Their Fingernails'
- House Speaker Simpson defends energy symposium
- Chinese chemical plant blast kills 1, injures 108
- Former Chinese oil executive convicted of graft
- Senators back limit on tarmac strandings
- China's foreign reserves rise to $2.13 trillion
- Iowa slaughterhouse child labor trial pushed back
- Boeing memo shows plans to cut 1,000 defense jobs
- Official: Venezuelan oil workers must be socialist
- Landmark bridal boutique in Mass. to close
DALLAS - A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by older pilots who sued their union over an interpretation of a law that raised the mandatory retirement age for airline pilots to 65.
The judge ruled that the pilots, who are over 60 and still work for Continental Airlines, have not been hurt by the union's interpretation, which would strip the older pilots of seniority.
Lawyers for the pilots and the union, the Air Line Pilots Association, were notified late Tuesday of the decision by U.S. District Judge James Robertson in Washington.
Kathy Bailey, attorney for the pilots, said she did not plan to appeal but would file a new lawsuit if any of the men lost their jobs or if the union wins a fight with Continental over interpretation of the law.
The 12 men — a 13th died in an accident involving an experimental plane — still work for Continental, mostly as instructors, but two handle regular passenger flights, Bailey said. They charged the union with age discrimination and failing to represent their interests as union members.
In 2007, Congress raised the mandatory retirement age to 65 from 60, a standard that had stood for a half-century.
Under a provision of the law, pilots who were already 60 when the new law took effect could continue to fly but would lose their seniority unless they were a "required flight deck member," a term that is in dispute.
The union doesn't believe the term covers instructors, but Houston-based Continental — "and apparently only Continental," the judge said — believes it does.
In September, the union filed a grievance against Continental over the issue. A decision is expected soon. If the union wins, Bailey's clients fear they would be fired.
Pilots unions long opposed raising the age-60 retirement rule. Younger pilots viewed a higher retirement age as an obstacle to their chances of moving up the ladder at their airlines. Seniority determines assignments and pay for airline pilots.




