Media Money
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
- My Exclusive Interview With Bob Iger
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- Disney's CFO-Theme Park Chairman Executive Swap
RSS FEED
- U.S. Stocks Slip, Dollar Rises
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Holiday Tipping: Who And How Much
- This Season: Everybody's A Scrooge
- Warren Buffett, Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' At Columbia
- Senate Democrats at Odds Over Health Care Bill
- What if a Recovery Is All in Your Head?
- Thanksgiving Week Stuffed With Economic News
- A Taxpayer's Must Read: The Fed Waltz With AIG
- Newspaper Circulation May Be Worse Than it Looks
- 10 Tips to Get Out of Debt
- Investors to Goldman: Be Less Greedy
Correspondent
It's not surprising that there's yet another lawsuit claiming copyright infringement in the music industry. But it is surprising that this latest suit doesn't attack typical pirates, but companies that actually run paid online music subscription services.
A consortium of 13 music companies is suing Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] , Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] and RealNetworks [RNWK
Loading...
()
] . The claim is that these music services play their songs without obtaining copyright permission and without paying the fee. MCS Music America, which represents the 13 companies and says it administers some 45,000 tracks, is demanding that each of the infringed songs be removed AND demanding $150,000 per act of infringement.
How much are they looking for? A lot; the court filing includes 90 pages that list tracks the company says were infringed. And MCS says they're not just looking for $150k a pop, but rather for that much every single time one of those songs was illegally downloaded or streamed. That seems aggressive, to say the least. I'm also surprised that these companies aren't asking to be fairly compensated for their songs moving forward, they want the tracks to be taken down, period.
How did this happen? You'd think that Microsoft, which knows something about lawsuits, would do its homework and pay for the content. Well they might have. It's possible that these companies licensed the rights to the recordings, but not the publishing rights — the rights to the compositions. We'll see what the court decides. I'd predict some sort of settlement.
Questions? Comments?









