![]()
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Twitter Takes A Hit
- Animalistic Behavior Against Novartis
- The Latest Hotness Indicator
- Scary Times for Novartis
- Build On Job Search Successes
- Fear Keeps Commercial Real Estate In Turmoil: CEO
- What Happened To Infrastructure?
- China's 2009 GDP Growth Seen at 8%: Think-Tank
- CEO Chambers: Cisco's Outlook Is Strong
- Senate Reaches Deal on $2 Billion 'Clunkers' Refill
- Australia Jobs Jump, Stokes Talk of Rate Rise
- Cisco Wary on Recovery, but Earnings Beat Forecasts
- CEO Chambers: Cisco's Outlook Is Strong

- Jobless Data, Retail Sales to Challenge Stocks
- Berkshire Results May Show Buffett Still Has the Touch
- SEC's Schapiro: Ban on Flash Trading Will Take Time
- American Express Credit Card Defaults Fall
- Secrets Of The Super-Rich: How Are They Investing?
- Finally, A Useful Product
- Cisco Beats; But Will It Also Raise?
- Trade Commodities to Hedge Against Inflation: Strategist
- Stimulus Spending Fails to Follow Unemployment, Poverty
- Tough Times for Teen Apparel Retailers
- Schork Oil Outlook: 'We Should Look for an Artificial pop Next Month'
- Prepare For a 10-12% Inflation: Stock Picker
- Stock Picker: There's Room for More Market Growth
- When Bad News is Good; Cisco Prepares to Report
US prosecutors on Wednesday asked a judge to sentence high-profile New York lawyer and admitted fraudster Marc Dreier to 145 years imprisonment or a term that ensures he spends the rest of his life in prison.
Dreier, 59, pleaded guilty in May to running a $400 million investment fraud involving fake promissory notes and he was released into house arrest until his sentencing on July 13.
While the size of the fraud is dwarfed by comparison with the estimated $65 billion disgraced financier Bernard Madoff admitted to swindling, prosecutors asked for a similar term of incarceration, the highest allowed by sentencing guidelines.
Madoff, 71, was senteneced to 150 years in prison on June 29.
In a memorandum to U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff, prosecutors wrote that Harvard and Yale educated Dreier, despite his advantages "decided to seek vast personal riches and prestige through a life of fraud and through dishonor to his profession."
The memorandum concluded that "a reasonable sentence in this case would be the guidelines' sentence of 145 years, or alternatively, a term of years that would assure that Dreier will remain in prison for life and forcefully promote general deterrence."
Dreier's lawyer Gerald Shargel suggested the judge give his client between 10 years and one month and 12 years and seven months in prison as an appropriate sentence.
Dreier is "profoundly remorseful" and has done what he can to make amends for his crimes, Shargel said in his sentencing memorandum. Dreier, himself, wrote Judge Rakoff, telling him, "There is no excuse whatsoever for what I have done." He added that he expected and desrved a significant prison sentence.
"For me, the punishment that I receive from this court will only be part of my sentence," he wrote. "I have already been disgraced beyond anything I could ever have imagined.
"Despite whatever good I once accomplished in my life, and what I had hoped to accomplish, I will always be remembered as a thief," Dreier wrote.








