- Chevron Says Q2 Hit by US Refining, Weak Dollar
- Stimulus Critics Put Obama, Democrats on Defensive
- Warren Buffett: Consumer Sales Remain 'Very, Very Soft'
- Don’t Get Burned By Hot Emerging Markets
- Busch: Chinese Bank Announces Bombshell
- Lenny Dykstra: 'Bank Fraud' Led to Bankruptcy
- Cramer: What to Expect This Earnings Season
- Christmas in July: Consumers to Out-Scrooge Scrooge
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon-Trading
- July 10th in Market History
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Options Smell 'Blood' on Infosys
- Christmas in July: Consumers To Out-Scrooge Scrooge
- GM's Second Chance
- Art Cashin: Traders Weigh Obama Policy Changes
- Warren Buffett: Economy Needs Another Dose of Viagra
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Will LeBron Dunk Tape Ever Be Released?
- Colo. gov. hails natural gas as criticial fuel
- Republic cuts staff, including 20 in newsroom
- ND Supreme Court rules in natural gas dispute
- N.H. tax evaders guilty on all weapons counts
- Integrys Energy sets 68-cent quarterly dividend
- Colgate-Palmolive sets 44-cent quarterly dividend
- Tim Hortons to open 13 locations in New York
- Canadian company to design new Algerian city
- Swine flu, recession sink Mexican tourism in May
HELENA, Mont. - State and national livestock groups are denouncing an effort by wildlife groups to pay ranchers not to graze cattle on the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge.
The World Wildlife Fund and National Wildlife Federation have set aside between $300,000 and $600,000 to buy out grazing rights. The groups say they want to end conflict between nesting birds and elk and foraging cattle.
The Montana Stockgrowers Association, the Montana Association of Grazing Districts and both the Montana and National Public Lands Council on Thursday call the grazing buyout effort "a giant step backward in finding ways for agriculture and wildlife groups to work together."
The livestock groups argue that sage grouse and elk can live in harmony with grazing cattle.
Errol Rice, executive vice president of the MSGA, says a better solution would be to seek balance between conservation and producer needs.




