- Raiders Rip Cash Machine Out of Bank's Wall
- Rebel Forces Could Create the Return of the I-Bank
- Ericsson Buys Nortel Wireless Units for $1.13 Billion
- Berkshire Hathaway Rallies to 6-Month Closing High
- 30,000 China Steelworkers in Deadly Clash: Report
- Obama Touts Healthcare Plan for Small Businesses
- Iran Vows to Hit Israel's Atomic Sites if Attacked: Report
- Market Insider: Earnings Remain a Tailwind for Stocks
- After Dismal Results, Is Tech Trade Intact?
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Hirschhorn: Manage Risk or it Will Manage You
- If FINA Ruling Holds, Business Would Change
- Homeownership Society: All in Good Time
- Compliments, Complaints, and the Obama T-Shirt Mystery
- Art Cashin: Dow 10,000 Possible Near-Term
- When Does Palm Stop Acting As Apple Wanna-be?
- Dunkelberg: 'To Raise the Cost of Labor, What is Congress Thinking?'
- Sometimes Fairy Tales Do Come True
- Australia resists 'Buy Australian' union pressure
- Oregon LNG sues Port of Astoria over lease
- State claims delay in Alaska oil spill case
- Obama hawks health care overhaul, citing study
- GE Oil and Gas to lay off 93 from Oshkosh site
- Summertime Santa: Anniston's ice cream man
- E-China: The bicycle kingdom is going electric
- Shreveport aims for mineral leases on 740 acres
- Mega indoor flea market opens in SC
Text Size 
LAS VEGAS - Three Wynn Las Vegas dealers have sued the Las Vegas Strip resort, claiming its tip sharing policy violates federal labor laws.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in U.S. District Court, claims that by requiring the dealers to share tips with supervisors, the resort is effectively paying the dealers nothing.
A lawyer for the dealers says resort management takes 15 percent to 20 percent of the pooled tips.
Wynn Las Vegas has long argued it has the authority to distribute tips in such a manner.
The dealers have claimed their tips were wrongfully diverted through the tip-pooling system implemented by the resort in 2006.
A lawsuit was filed at that time in district court, but the Nevada Supreme Court ruled the Nevada labor commissioner should consider the case instead. That case is still pending.
Print
Email
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes