Tech Check
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- US Home Prices Up 5th Month, 2nd Straight Quarter
- Gold Will Collapse Like Oil Did in 2008: Charts
- China Eastern to Complete Shanghai Air Buy by End '09
- Why Amazon Rules Retail
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- Weak Dollar Is Golden for Mining Companies
- Revised GDP Reading Puts Growth at 2.8%; Inflation Tame
- CA "More Profitable" After Saving Energy: CEO
- 5 Stocks That Benefit from Health Care Legislation: Analysts
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- HP's Mark Hurd
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- 9 Stocks That Play Rising Water Costs: Strategists
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Gold Prices Can Double in 3 Years: Portfolio Manager
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- US Home Prices Up 5th Month, 2nd Straight Quarter
- Revised GDP Reading Puts Growth at 2.8%; Inflation Tame
- US Economy Mired in 'Form of Depression': Rosenberg
- Strong Banks, Weak Credit: Treasury Rethinks TARP
- Weak Dollar Is Golden for Mining Companies
- How Many US Consumers Will Shop this Weekend?
- GE Capital Losses May See Dramatic Fall: JP Morgan
- Galleon's Rajaratnam Denies Inside Trading Charges
- Holiday Guide to This Season's Smartphones
RSS FEED
Silicon Valley Bureau Chief
![]() |
When the Palm Pre [PALM
Loading...
()
] was unveiled, and in subsequent announcements from Palm about its nifty new smart phone, one of the key selling points was its seamless integration and synchronization with Apple's iTunes [AAPL
Loading...
()
], online music and video software.
Which always struck me as odd.
Consider: Apple owns iTunes, part of an incredibly compelling hardware and software ecosystem (unless of course you're in France where officials have complained that "incredibly compelling ecosystems" is another way of saying unfair monopoly that's unfair to users even though Apple has sold tens of millions of iPods and iPhones and billions of songs.)
Yet Palm's own web site proclaims users can use the Palm media sync feature to transfer your DRM-free iTunes music, videos and photos to your Pre. A footnote says the Pre is compatible with iTunes v8.2, though "compatibility with future versions not guaranteed." True enough as we're learning today.
Why? Because Apple released its newest version of its iTunes software, 8.2.1, and guess what? That syncing feature that lets Palm's Pre hook up with iTunes has been disabled. Something Apple threatened it would do as soon as Palm began chirping about its iTunes sync compatibility.
Look, I'm all in favor of consumer freedom and choice, but not at the expense of the innovators who bring new technology to the market, and when that freedom affects their ability to control their innovations. A wink wink and a nod nod when it comes to scoring iTunes on a non-Apple device might be one thing, but geez, Palm's been loudly banging a drum that Pre users can backdoor their way into iTunes.
Spokesperson Lynn Fox told the Wall Street Journal, "If Apple chooses to disable media sync in iTunes, it will be a direct blow to their users who will be deprived of a seamless synchronization experience." On her Twitter, she reiterates: "You heard me. Direct blow."
But is it? Which users? iTunes users who left their Apple hardware for the Pre? I'm still trying to find market research about iPhone users who have made the switch from Apple hardware to Palm. Remember it was Palm's lead investor Roger McNamee who famously claimed, and then Palm more famously retracted, that "not one of those (first iPhone users) will still be using an iPhone" once the Palm Pre was released. My sense is that most iTunes users are iPhone and iPod users. And if they're like me, and need a keyboard, they're Research in Motion Blackberry [RIMM
Loading...
()
] users and also keep an iPod Touch handy.
I called Palm for some clarification about all this. Fox sent me an email reminding me that "we aren’t using iTunes, we’re syncing a user’s non-DRM content from their iTunes account to the music player (which is not iTunes) on their Pre." But that doesn't address the issue of using someone else's technology as a selling point for you own.
Which leads me back to my original question: How can Palm honestly believe it could co-opt another company's technology and use it as a selling point for its own product? Exploiting another's security loophole and tricking the software into believing your product is really one of theirs is a poor substitute for "innovation." The underlying message seems to be, we don't have our own way of getting music onto our multimedia device, so we'll just take someone else's. And yet when the first company takes action against the second, Palm's response is to attack the move as "anti-consumer." Huh?
Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris released this statement: "iTunes 8.2.1 is a free software update that provides a number of important bug fixes. It also disables devices falsely pretending to be iPods, including the Palm Pre. As we've said before, newer versions of Apple's iTunes software may no longer provide syncing functionality with unsupported digital media players."
If you don't like it, don't use iTunes. Don't buy an iPhone. Or an iPod. Don't shop at Apple. Don't patronize the company. What? Yeah, didn't think so.
Questions? Comments?









