- BofA May Face $12 Billion Credit Cards Charge: KBW
- Bernanke: May Need to Tighten to Prevent Inflation
- California Governor and Lawmakers Reach Budget Deal
- UK Public Finances Register Worst June on Record
- Roubini: Recovery From Recession Will Be 'Very Ugly'
- Some China Universities Inflate Graduate Jobs Data
- Tuesday Look Ahead: Earnings May Trump Bernanke
- UK Financial Watchdog Issues Bonus Warning
- Deutsche Bank Fires 2 Execs in Spying Probe: Report
- Jets Owner Says New Stadium Will Be Sold Out
- Toshiba Feeling the Blu's; Apple Next?
- Tech Stocks vs ETFs: Earnings Season Strategies
- CNBC’s Sports Twitter Rankings (July ’09)
- Toyota's New U.S. Boss: 'Time to Get Close to The Customer'
- Art Cashin: My Take on Goldman's S&P Call
- Lenny Dykstra, Michael Jackson, And Goldman Sachs is Running The Country - Your Emails
- Secular Bear Market For Another 10 Years: Strategist
- Lodging Losses Mount
- Abu Dhabi's Aabar sets up Austrian joint venture
- Saudi prince's Kingdom Hldg Q2 profits drop 83 pct
- Budget decisions could fuel political backlash
- Bernanke preps for hot seat on bailouts, recovery
- Nordea posts 11 pct drop in 2Q net, raises outlook
- China says profit at state companies down
- Growth slumps in Chinese boomtown Dongguan
- Details of agreement to close California deficit
- House panel OKs new long-term care program
WILMINGTON, Delaware - A bankruptcy judge on Thursday denied a request by auto parts supplier Visteon Corp. to approve severance and retention plans for its nonunion employees.
In denying the proposed severance plan, Judge Christopher Sontchi said its inclusion of 12 company officers violated bankruptcy law. He also expressed concern that there might be officers among the 3,300 other workers who would be covered by the plan.
Sontchi expressed similar concerns about the proposed retention plan, wondering if it included employees who should be considered officers.
The judge did say Visteon could submit revised plans if it can clearly identify which employees are officers.
Visteon attorneys argued that the plans are needed to ease anxiety among workers concerned about losing their jobs, and to keep key employees from leaving the company.
"It's really to keep people focused on what we have to do to move the business forward," chief financial officer William Quigley testified Thursday.
But Sontchi noted that bankruptcy laws prohibit severance payments to a company officer unless the severance program is generally applicable to all full-time employees, and payments to the officer do not exceed a certain multiple of the amounts given to non-management employees.
The United Auto Workers objected to the severance plan, noting that it excluded union employees and was proposed at a time when Visteon wants to cut medical and life insurance benefits for UAW retirees.
Peter DeChiara, an attorney for the UAW, noted that 1,750 unionized employees would be excluded from the severance plan.
"There are unionized employees at the company who are not covered by any severance plan," he added.
The proposed severance plan would have covered more than 3,300 nonunion employees and carried a maximum payout of about $115 million to those who lost their jobs involuntarily. Half of that amount would be reimbursed by Ford Motor Co. because Visteon's work force includes salaried employees assigned to Automotive Components Holdings LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ford. Visteon is the top supplier to and a former subsidiary of Ford.
The retention plan would have authorized payments of up to $3 million to 50 employees identified as critical to Visteon's ongoing operations and reorganization.



