![]()
- The Secret Lives of Traders—Seeking the Next Hot Thing
- Markets Finally Get Greek Deal —So Where's the Rally?
- Warren Buffett: Stocks Will Outperform Gold and Bonds
- Greece Deal Fails to Convince, EU Demands More
- 'Mortgage Deal from Hell' Hurts Sound Borrowers: Bove
- Clint Eastwood: Super Bowl Ad Endorses No One
- Zynga, Hasbro Partner to Make Toys, Games
- Home Builder Optimism Up, Industry Expert Says
- A Wealthy Backer Likes the Odds on Santorum
MOST SHARED
- Stocks Looking Past Europe for a New Driver
- Canaccord, China's Eximbank Plan $1 Billion Resource Fund
- Jobs You Can Do Forever
- DBS Fourth-Quarter Profit Rises 8%; Tops Forecast
- Chart Patterns Suggest Pullback at Hand
- Australia's Newcrest First-Half Underlying Profit Up 17%
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- Mulling Buffett's Stock Advice? Get in With REITs: Fund Managers
- UPDATE: Massive Trend Just Getting Underway in Financial Services: Finerman
- LinkedIn Earnings Bode Well for Hiring and Social Media
MOST POPULAR
HOT ON FACEBOOK
Frank: SEC Pay Oversight Would Limit 'Excessive Risk'
Special to CNBC.com
A new bill giving the SEC power to directly limit compensation for Wall Street employees will help put an end to a culture of excessive risk-taking, Congressman Barney Frank told CNBC Tuesday.
The bill was was approved late Tuesday by the House Financial Services Committee, which Frank chairs. The measure was approved in a 40-28 party-line vote.
The bill advances a component of the Obama administration's broad plan to tighten financial regulation. It's expected to be voted on by the full House on Friday.
Frank, a Democrat, introduced the bill, which gives "explicit instructions to the SEC with regard to financial institutions to disallow any compensation schemes that excessively reward risk," he says.
When asked what he meant by "excessive risk," Frank declined to quantify it. "Dollar amounts are for the shareholders to decide," he says. "By excessive we mean you have to have a two-way street."
The current bill is an extension of a previous proposal crafted by the Obama administration earlier in July that would give shareholders a non-binding vote on determining executive pay, as well as require that members of compensation committees lack any financial relationships with the firm.
The new bill also aims to postpone reward for risky trades up to a year after the fact. "Compensation shouldn't kick in until a reasonable time period," Frank says, arguing that a payoff should be delayed until the ramifications of a decision are recognized, or "ripened" in Frank's words.
He goes as far to suggest that compensation already paid out for risky trades that pay off in the short run but lose money after a year may be clawed back. "Not all of it, but some of it," he says.
Borrowed from existing laws in England, the new legislation is designed to "prevent the kind of systemic risk that comes when people get paid off for taking risks and suffer no penalty when the risks go bad," says Frank.
Here are the bill's specific provisions:
- Gives shareholders of publicly held companies the right to an annual, non-binding vote on executive compensation;
- Gives shareholders the right to vote on special pay arrangements, such as golden parachutes, for executives in mergers, acquisitions or other changes in corporate control;
- Requires members of corporate compensation committees to be independent of management;
- Requires compensation consultants or other advisers to compensation committees to be independent;
- Empowers regulators to ban pay structures at financial institutions covered under the legislation that encourage "inappropriate risks" threatening the institutions' safety and soundness or the economy and financial stability.






