![]()
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- US Job Losses to Bottom out Next Quarter: NABE
- Little Sign of Inflation on the Horizon: IMF
- Kraft Weighs Higher Cadbury Bid as Rivals Circle
- MBS Program Should be Extended: Fed's Bullard
- JPMorgan's Dimon Could Succeed Geithner: Report
- Wall Street Finds Profits by Reducing Mortgages
- Warren Buffett, Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' At Columbia
- Microsoft, News Corp Weigh Online News Pact
- CNBC VIDEO: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' at Columbia University
- U.S. Stocks Slip, Dollar Rises
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
Mine is a story of government intervention gone wrong, of well-meaning intentions unfulfilled.
You see, I qualified for President Obama's Making Home Affordable Program. You should find that absurd.
A few months back interest rates were at record lows and I decided to refinance my fixed rate mortgage. I called Bank of America [BAC
Loading...
()
], my loan servicer, and after a couple of questions the nice guy who answered the phone told me I qualified for the new government program.
"That can't be possible," I said. "That program is for people in dire straits. It is meant to help people in trouble. I'm just trying to do a basic refi."
He told me that yes, I absolutely qualified and directed me to the program's Web site.
To get an MHA refi I had to be:
1. Employed
2. Current on my mortgage
3. In a loan currently owned by Fannie Mae [FNM
Loading...
()
] or Freddie Mac [FRE
Loading...
()
]
4. In a loan that didn't exceed 105 percent of the value of my home
Money & Politics With Larry Kudlow:
If I went with the program what did I get? Speed. The bank did no income verification and no appraisal. Instead the nice man on the phone just typed my address into a government database that told him the approximate value of my home.
The refi was done in a lightning-quick three weeks.
I comparison shop and I got the same rate that everyone else was offering: 4.8 percent down from my then-rate of 6.7 percent.
Closing costs appeared to be the same regardless of the company.
More on Housing and the Economy:
To its credit, the White House has acknowledged the program isn't working. That's because the worst of the subprime mortgages are on homes that have fallen so far in value that a loan-to-value ratio of 105 percent or even the more generous level of 125 percent is a pipe dream.
Here's the bottom line: This was supposed to be helping people in need.
When banks or politicians start bragging about "all the people who have been kept in their homes," be suspicious.
- Technology can make or break a fortune in the world of alternative energy.
- The Victoria's Secret Fashion Show attracts a big TV audience every year, but this year it may take on even more importance.
- Many people are facing the holidays with substantially smaller incomes. Here’s how some are adapting.
- Jim Cramer is a proponent of stocks that pay healthy dividends, and here are his top five dividend plays.
- The homebuyer's tax credit jacked sales for a while, but 2010 is looking weak. Now what?
- CNBC’s technology reporter Jim Goldman guides you through the best gadgets to buy this holiday season.













