Skip navigation

Pharma's Market

SPECIAL REPORT


Current DateTime: 05:43:55 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 32984624

PHARMA'S MARKET VIDEO

» More

Current DateTime: 05:43:55 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 31171988
Expiration DateTime: 11/23/2009 5:45:08 AM

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 05:43:56 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 31171995
powered by digg
The Novartis Attackers Reveal Themselves
Published: Thursday, 6 Aug 2009 | 2:15 PM ET
Text Size
By: Mike Huckman
Reporter

On this website for something called "Bite Back" magazine a group identifying itself as MFAH Austria is claiming responsibility for the recent attacks on Swiss drugmaker Novartis and its employees, including CEO Dr. Daniel Vasella. Some folks here at CNBC came up with their own interpretation of the abbreviation M F A H (think about it), but it supposedly stands for Militant Forces Against Huntingdon. That's the animal lab company in the U.K. and here in New Jersey that the activists (many Pharma's Market readers prefer to call them terrorists) have been targeting for years.

Daniel Vasella's Hunting House.
Photo by: Zoom-Tirol
Daniel Vasella's Hunting House.

The web posting also features this "anonymously" submitted picture presumably of Dr. Vasella's vacation home in Austria.

A Novartis spokesperson says the house appears to be the CEO's, but they're not absolutely certain.

The MFAH claims to have poured 16 gallons of gas on the house before setting it on fire.

And the writers of the responsibility claim renew their threat against Dr. Vasella writing, "Understand this: This will continue until you sever all ties with Huntingdon Life Sciences. We will attack your private life wherever possible. We will destroy your life."

The Novartis spokesperson says the company doesn't do business with HLS anymore.

I will save samples of the dozens of blogreader emails I've received about my previous post for another time, but one person emailed to complain that the poll on the previous post about animal testing is rigged. It's unscientific and that's made perfectly clear. But it's been interesting to watch the pendulum swing back and forth. At first, supporters of animal testing were ahead by a nine-to-one margin. Then a flurry of votes came in on the other side and it went nine-to-one in the opposite direction. And then thousands more votes suddenly flooded in saying animal testing is necessary and the results flipped back overwhelmingly yet again. Me thinks the passionate folks on both sides have been sending out email blitzes or something asking people to vote their way.

So, here's another "unscientific" poll.

Questions?  Comments?  and follow me on Twitter at mhuckman

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Add This share icon
Text Size
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 05:27:33 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:04:22 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 01:45:44 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:00:28 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters