Skip navigation

LATEST TECHNOLOGY VIDEO


Current DateTime: 12:10:47 25 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 19836971
Expiration DateTime: 11/25/2009 12:12:11 PM
    • The First Word on AOL 

        Time Warner is spinning off its troubled child, Internet company AOL. Ross Sandler, analyst at RBC Capital Markets, takes a closer look.

    • UK Online Retail Could Rake in £53bn in 2009 

        “More and more people are shopping online; there is no doubt about that,” David Smith from IMRG told CNBC. While the postal strikes created a slight dip in online sales at the end of October, “by the end of the year, we are expecting round about £53 billion to be spent online for the year,” he added.

powered by digg
There’s an App for That. But a Revenue Stream?
Published: Monday, 10 Aug 2009 | 12:10 PM ET
Text Size
By: Stephanie Clifford
The New York Times

Media brands are jumping onto the iPhone. USA Today? There’s an app for that. “The Rachel Maddow Show”? “Entertainment Tonight”? Public radio? Yes, yes and yes, there are apps for those.

Now, if only there were an app that showed media companies how to make money on the iPhone.

Apple iPhone 3G S
AP

For them, the early days of iPhone applications resemble the early days of the Internet. They know they need to have an app for the iPhone [AAPL  Loading...      ()   ], and so they are creating appealing ones that are loaded with features.

“The iPhone has really been a phenomenon, so I think most media brands, at least the national ones, are thinking it’s a place they have to be,” said Matt Jones, vice president for mobile strategy and operations at Gannett Digital-USA Today.

Yet, as with the Web, it is far from clear how much revenue media apps for the iPhone can produce.

“We’re all trying to figure out as we go: is there a subscription model here, is it an advertising model, is there a monthly recurring revenue stream, is it a one-time payment model?” Mr. Jones said. “It’s a very fluid model.”

Media executives began thinking about iPhone applications in 2008, when Apple started allowing outside developers to create applications for the iPhone. (Google [GOOG  Loading...      ()   ] and Research in Motion [RIMM  Loading...      ()   ], maker of the BlackBerry, followed Apple with their own application stores, allowing designers to create programs for phones running their operating software.)

More from CNBC.com

Application developers can make money either by setting a price for their applications or showing advertising on them. Media companies have chosen mostly to offer their apps free. In the top 20 free news applications on a recent day, 15 established media brands were sponsoring apps. But in the top 20 paid news applications, only two were associated with big media brands — Al Jazeera and Reddit, a technology Web site that Condé Nast owns.

Jason Spero, vice president and managing director for North America at AdMob, which serves ads on applications and whose clients include CBS, said the big brands his company dealt with were 30 to 50 percent sold out on their inventory for banner advertising, with some selling as much as 80 percent at their peak.

“Most of these apps run considerably below 100 percent full, but they’ve got significant C.P.M.’s they’ve been able to charge,” he said, using the industry term for cost-per-thousand ads. “There’s a very real business model for these companies on the iPhone.”

But the advertising pool is small. Magna, a unit of the Interpublic Group, reported in May that it expected advertisers to spend $229 million this year on mobile media, including mobile Web sites and applications. Though that is up 36 percent from 2008, it is revised down from Magna’s forecast in the summer of 2008 of a growth rate of 43 percent. And $229 million is a tiny slice of the advertising pie.


Current DateTime: 12:10:48 25 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 22528556

Executives at some major media companies say they hope to gain exposure for their brand by developing apps, rather than relying on them to be big revenue producers. KCRW, the public radio station in the Los Angeles area, is an extreme example of that, as it has no mandate to produce a profit.

“Our mission has always been to get our content out there — it was just part of who we are as public broadcasters,” said Anil Dewan, director of new media for the station. In June, KCRW introduced three applications: one with KCRW programming, one running videos about food and one showing musicians performing in-studio sessions at the station.

Development of the applications was relatively cheap — the KCRW Radio software cost an estimated $35,000, and the other two cost significantly less — and took about eight months, almost three months longer than KCRW had planned, Mr. Dewan said.

The apps cost 99 cents to download; once people have paid for the app, they can listen to it as much as they like.

“We thought it prudent to charge a minimal fee to help offset some of those costs and also make sure we have funds available for future versions of the application,” Mr. Dewan said. “We felt it was unfair to take revenue coming in from membership, say, and use it to build a platform that as of now only applies to a select few.” He said he did not know whether the app would be profitable.

Even some for-profit companies are not relying on their apps as big revenue generators.

MSNBC.com has introduced applications for the “Today” show, “Rachel Maddow” and MSNBC.com in the last few months.

“My opinion is it’s mainly a branding and content play, getting our content out in additional platforms,” said Catherine Captain, the general manager of TodayShow.com. “I do believe you get a circular effect: someone interested in you in mobile is exposed to the brand and to your great content. They may then be more likely to tune in to the show or go to the Web site.”

Still, Ms. Captain said, the application carries advertising, and the “Today” program application sold out its display inventory for June.

Regarding the ad revenue, she said, “I wouldn’t say it’s the reason for being in the space, but it’s a very healthy side benefit.”

Add This share icon
Text Size
  • digg share

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

  • For nearly three decades, these on-call experts have been dishing advice on how to – and not to – cook turkey.
  • Eric Schmidt pledges to create a virtual copy of the Iraq National Museum at Google’s expense.
  • Bill Griffeth is taking a leave of absence from CNBC and Power Lunch for a year. Here's a message from Bill.
  • More shoppers than ever plan to comparison-shop this season. Who will benefit?
  • It may be the most unusual guide to business you'll read.
  • Cut Credit cards
  • How can you get out of debt and back on the road to recovery? Follow these ten steps.
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 10:38:03 25 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 10:38:03 25 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 10:38:03 25 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 10:38:03 25 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters