Media Money
- Facebook's COO Sheryl Sandberg to Harvard Grads: ‘Can You Click On an Ad or Two’
- NCTA Trends: Mobile video, Watch ESPN and TV Everywhere
- Discovery CEO David Zaslav on OWN, Global Growth & Netflix Impact
- National Cable Show: Cloud, Wifi, TV Everywhere Loom Large
- Facebook: Hacking All Night to an IPO
- Why Facebook Is Celebrating Its IPO With a Hackathon
- Inside Facebook's Money Machine
- Sheryl Sandberg: Facebook's Billion-Dollar Woman
- Diablo III Launch Breaks Records and Servers
- Privacy in Focus Ahead of Facebook IPO
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Greece to Leave Euro Zone on June 18: Wealth Manager
- European Firms Plan for Greek Unrest and Euro Exit
- Banks Recapitalization Is a 'Necessary Evil': Strategist
- Euro Rallies as Greece's Pro-Bailout Parties Gain Favor
- Italy 2-Year Borrowing Costs at Peak Since December
- Blair Says Feared Provoking British Media Wrath
- Europe’s Stronger Powers Must Reveal Plans: Ex-BoE Official
- Oil and Gas Sectors Power Aveva Profit Lift
- Newedge to Leave Greek Stock Market
- How Boaz Weinstein and Hedge Funds Outsmarted JPMorgan
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Public Pensions Faulted for Bets on Rosy Returns
- Greece to Leave Euro Zone on June 18: Wealth Manager
- Italy 2-Year Borrowing Costs at Peak Since December
- Euro Bond Wins Supporters, but Details Remain Vague
- German, UK Bond Yields Will Go Even Lower
- Labor Board Member Resigns Over Leak to GOP Allies
- Banks Recapitalization Is a 'Necessary Evil': Strategist
- Loan Scheme Launches for Youth Business Start-Ups

- Southern Europeans Wire Cash to Safer North
Publicis Exec Talks Razorfish
Correspondent
The battle between the ad giants and the tech giants - Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] and Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] - is really heating up.
Publicis, one of the world's biggest ad agencies, shelled out $530 million for Microsoft's interactive Razorfish. This means Publicis will generate 25 percent of its revenue from digital ads, helping in its push to compete with the likes of WPP. But perhaps most interesting, it gives Microsoft a new ally in its online ad battle with Google.
The five-year agreement between Publicis and Microsoft gives Microsoft a stake in Publicis and gives the ad company attractive terms for display and search ads from Microsoft, in exchange for minimum guaranteed purchases. It incentivizes Publicis to encourage its clients to give extra consideration, let's say, to Microsoft ads. This builds on an ad deal Publicis and Microsoft made in June, and it is in addition to a deal Publicis has had with Google since January 2008.
Razorfish may be the latest pawn in Microsoft and Google's battle for web ad dollars, but what does this mean for the interactive ad agency and the company that acquired it? I spoke with David Kenny, the manager of Vivaki, Publicis' digital and media division, which will oversee Razorfish. Kenny told me that his team and Microsoft worked on a model to enable their clients to get the best deals in terms of rates, data about the ad's impact, inventory, and technology. He explained that they won't be forcing media deals on their clients, but while they present Microsoft offerings to their clients, they expect them to be particularly appealing.
An alliance with Microsoft certainly provides an advantage - insight, and even input into business of generating and selling ad inventory.
But what does this mean for Publicis' relationship with Google?
Kenny insists that their clients need to work with both of Google and Microsoft, and both Microsoft and Google want to work with them. (Though I would suppose that Microsoft would much prefer they *just* work with Microsoft). Kenny argues that Google and Microsoft are two parallel businesses selling different ad inventory, and if they're buying search ad terms they'll buy the same terms for different platforms.
I think this issue is only going to get more and more complicated. Kenny says that Bing "just gives customers another choice and our money will follow wherever the customers are." But with Bing trying to grab Google marketshare and Google going into Microsoft's arena, it's more than *just* another choice.
It's the start of a long battle and ad relationships with mega agencies like Publicis will be key in driving revenue to both of the giants.
Questions? Comments?









