Skip navigation

Executive Careers


Current DateTime: 10:24:27 24 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 26658570
    • Mining Gems 

        A look at a silver company's stock which is up more than 290 percent this year, with Dennis Wheeler, Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation CEO.

    • One on One with Singapore Airlines 

        CNBC's Maria Bartiromo has the story on a possible recovery in the airline industry, with Chew Choon Seng, Singapore Airlines CEO.

    • Citi's Loans & Lifelines 

        Explaining the company's efforts and why the government's program is not doing enough, with Sanjiv Das, Citi Mortgage CEO.

    • Celling Flu Vaccines 

        Novartis is trying to get ahead of the game with the first-ever U.S. based plant to make cell-based flu vaccines, with Dr. Daniel Vasella, Novartis chairman/CEO.

    • Medtronic CEO on Earnings, Outlook 

        Bill Hawkins, chairman and CEO of Medtronic, discusses his company's quarterly results.


Current DateTime: 10:24:28 24 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 31426513
Expiration DateTime: 11/24/2009 10:27:13 PM
powered by digg
Execs: Are You Ready For This Attack?
Published: Thursday, 3 Sep 2009 | 12:29 PM ET
Text Size

Just hold on-- no one is taking your money just yet.

It's not over!

Perhaps many of you thought that the collective screaming on the topic of executive compensation would be reserved for the heads of financial institutions.

But that was likely just the beginning.

By this Friday, Congress will have received detailed reports from more than 50 health insurers, who were "asked" to supply information on management salaries and packages that top $500,000 a year.

Whatever the reality, it's perception that counts. And it's true that those amounts will probably shock some citizens. No. 1 on the list, H. Edward Hanway of Cigna, takes home more than $11 million, and the perception of the public at large, caught between spiraling costs and unstable income, is that figures like that are just too much. Further, for many, the health insurance industry has always generated feelings of anger (just as it is doing now with reform debate raging in Congress and at town meetings). Plenty of people that have health coverage feel that their denied claims could well have been approved, if the funds hadn't already been set aside for the men in charge. (The percentage of premium earmarked for patient care was one of the items included in the survey.) According to a CNNMoney.com story on this subject, a PriceWaterhouseCoopers study found that "in the early 1990s, health insurers spent more than 90 cents of every dollar collected on patient care, but … in 2007, national publicly-traded health companies spent about 81 cents of every dollar on patient care."

Vault

No one's going to be discussing the salaries in journalism/publishing (a business segment never known for its perks even before the collapse of the industry), but at this point, it seems as if every other industry is fair game. Health insurers are asking why they should be singled out. So, what's the best way to deflect the debate? Ask top executives to formally justify their existence every year? Come up with some fancily-spun "statistics"? Practice some misdirection? Sorry, but people are too smart to swallow those two latter options. As for the first, it could lead to an escalation of the situation, not relief. Yes, executive tenure would likely decrease substantially with a "justification" procedure in place, but that could force compensation packages even higher as companies pile on the perks to land the best available candidate with the highest probability of sticking around.

Likely the best advice is to wait it out.

Analysts, the media and everyone else ramped up the rhetoric on executive compensation after the flame-out of Enron in 2001. And here we are, still talking about it eight years later. True, the discussion is playing out in an environment colored (permanently?) by the recession. Plus, reform will definitely come to pass for companies that took bailout money, and EU legislators are talking about similar compensation controls. But amidst an economy slow to enter the recovery stage, and loud political battles on CIA abuses and health care, it seems there are more important problems to tackle, so little will come of all the hand-wringing. The thunder won't get any louder and you'll weather the storm without having to open your 401(k)umbrella. And at that point, you can start preparing for the next series of income attacks in three to five years.

More Executive Strategies Including:

________________________________
Todd Obolsky has covered a wide range of industries for Vault’s print and online company profiles (including consumer products, government, non-profit, retail, advertising, internet, energy and publishing) and manages Vault’s Layoff Tracker. He has also written for Penguin Group’s Rough Guides and DK travel series. He holds a BS in Mathematics from Bucknell University and an MBA (with a market research concentration) from City University of New York’s Baruch College.

Comments?  Send them to

© 2009 CNBC.com
Add This share icon
Text Size
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 03:14:50 24 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 12:00:47 24 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 04:59:27 24 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 12:00:49 24 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters