Skip navigation

CNBC Two-Way Street

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 04:06:37 26 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30001682
powered by digg
Gnashing Teeth at the Typo
Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2009 | 4:20 PM ET
Text Size
By: Allen Wastler
Managing Editor, CNBC.com

It is the bane of every editor. The typo.

They are like cockroaches. You urge writers to prevent them. You tell editors to be alert and crush them. You spellcheck for them. You force people to read copy backwards in an effort to find the ones hidden in mental context.

And still they crawl out of the copy.

You tend to get a fair number in Internet news ... partly because of that time pressure thing to
get the story up and out as quickly as possible. When I was in newspapers we'd get typos too. But not as many. You had more time to write and re-read your story. And there was time for copy editors to go over it a few times. Still, the typos would appear. Nice thing about the Internet, you can correct them. On newsprint, it's there forever, baby.

Our readers let us know about them. Some do it nicely. Others not so nicely. For example, a remark from a reader this afternoon: Does anyone there edit what goes up on line? It's pathetic. — Chris

Sigh. No credit for all the stories we get up without typos. But I can understand the viewpoint. Typos are typically taken as a sign of sloppiness. If you mix up your "is" and your "if," how can you be trusted to get the yield curve right? A valid point. If it's any excuse, and it's not, writers typically typo because they are so preoccupied with the bigger picture they forget to do the little stuff right. Editors let typos get by for much the same reason. Plus all their multi-tasking demands.

Anyway, thanks to those of you who give us the heads up. Oh and ironically ... Chris? There was a typo in your missive ... no "s" was needed on "unprofessional."

Update: Yes, I have a typo up there. I wish I could say I did it for a double-dose of irony. Alas no ... it was there from the beginning. A news associate here pointed it out as soon as it was up. I corrected. And it came back because of the picture displacement and the fact that our CMS can't &^#*%$@ position things right. I'm leaving it there. As punishment. Thanks to those who wrote in.


Questions? Comments? We want to hear from you:
Name:
Email Address
(not displayed):
City and State:
Your question or comment:

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Add This share icon
Text Size
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:44:15 26 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:03:48 26 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 01:03:48 26 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:03:48 26 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters