CNBC Two-Way Street
RSS FEED
- CNBC Anchor Takes a Sabbatical
- Links: More Important Than We May Think
- Changing What Was Said
- Radio Rounds: A Job Loss and Education
- A Big Net Deal: Getting Staff's Attention
- Site Hot Links? Fear and Greed
- Balloon Boy: Not Your Average Business Story
- Hot Items: Gold, Gifts and Gritty Prison Fights
- Hot Links for Monday
MOST SHARED
- Ritz-Carlton ?Struggling? in the US: President
- Garlic Price Rises Surpass Gold, Stocks in China
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- New-Home Sales Jump 6.2% To Highest Level in Over Year
- Half of Banks' Losses May Still Be Hidden: IMF Head
- The Executive Job Search
- Consumer Mood Improves, But Anxiety Over Personal Finances
- Salvation Army's Kettles Now Credit Card-Ready
- Activision Prepares to Double Dip on ‘Modern Warfare 2’
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- Revenge of the Gangsta Nerds
- Will TCU See The "Flutie Effect?"
- Halftime Report: New Signs Of Downdraft In Market?
- Consumers Catching the Holiday Spirit
- It's Beginning To Look A Lot More Riskless
- Hedge Funds Take Early Lead in Warren Buffett's 'Big Bet'
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Treasury On Mortgage Modifications
- Blue Jeans Expected to See Another Green Christmas
- Investors Thankful for Gains This Year
Text Size 
Managing Editor, CNBC.com
Swine flu or H1N1 ... what's your call?
We're having lots of debates about it in-house and with our companion news outlets.
You see the pork industry, for obvious reasons, would prefer the media to use the more scientific term. Can't blame it, really. Bacon isn't going to give you the flu, but with all the pig imagery associated with the epidemic coverage ... well, it can't be good for sales.
On the other hand, "swine flu" tends to be a more reader/viewer friendly term. Writers and reporters are constantly prodded to avoid alphabet-soup, jargony terminology. Also, some journos tend to get their hackles up when pushed by industry or government to adopt a certain phraseology. It's that "fight the spin" instinct that, frankly, can go a little far.
The journalistic fall back of Do What's Accurate isn't a whole lot of help here either. H1N1 actually refers to strains that have appeared in previous years. If we want to be full blown accurate, it'd be "2009 H1N1" or "Novel H1N1" -- even more of a mouthful. "Swine flu" seems to be the accepted name for what's going on now. And this strain of flu, while it has human and avian elements, is about half-swine based.
We're probably going to go with a switch-hitting approach ... use whichever term is more appropriate for the context. Scientific discussions should lend themselves to H1N1. General reporting on public fear will be more about "swine flu." But our debate is ongoing.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes