- US in Recovery But Jobs Growth Slow: Summers
- Chinese Growth Quickens in Third Quarter, as Expected
- US Orders Deep Pay Cuts at Bailed-Out Companies
- Credit Suisse Thrashes Third Quarter Earnings Forecast
- Poll: Is Obama Justified In Cutting Executive Pay?
- Windows 7 May Help Kickstart Delayed Corporate Spend
- States With the Highest Unemployment Rates
- Thursday Look Ahead: It's All About the Dollar
- US To Press China on Piracy at High-Level Talks
- Maria Bartiromo's Interview With Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
- 5-Star Stock Picks: 'Stability' in Commercial Real Estate (!)
- Oct. 21: 79 S&P Stocks Hit New 52-Week Highs
- Forget Dow 10K—S&P 1,000 is New Support Level: Strategist
- Bing To Incorporate Twitter, Facebook Updates
- Home Builders, FHA, And The Future
- Do You Have What It Takes to Make an Impact?
- Time to End TARP for Big Banks: Equity Analyst
- Do You Know Where Your Stakeholders Are
- Hispanic farmers fight to sue USDA
- Anglo American to sell off noncore assets
- Hyundai Motor profit surges amid sales jump
- British postal workers begin 48-hour walkout
- Paper maker Stora Enso Q3 loss widens to euro520 mln
- Nestle: 9-month sales fall 2.2 percent
- Ericsson profits drop 71.5 percent in 3rd quarter
- Pernod Ricard sales down 6 pct in first quarter
- Novartis posts 1 percent growth in 3Q net profit
COLUMBUS, Ohio - A plan by a Midwest utility to distribute energy-efficient light bulbs to customers backfired when it was learned that the recipients would not only have to pay for the bulbs, but also pay the utility for the electricity they wouldn't be using.
Ohio's governor sent a letter to regulators who pulled the plug on the program for now, or at least on the charges that caught consumers off guard.
Utilities have been pushing consumers to become more efficient as states set new energy standards. It's not the first time consumers have felt they've been pushed too hard.
Nearly two years ago, Allegheny Power apologized for mailing energy-efficient bulbs to its 220,000 Maryland customers without letting them know they would be footing the bill. Maryland regulators said the company ignored instructions to inform customers about the program.
FirstEnergy's Ohio is now promising to work with the state's Public Service Commission to settle the dustup.
Total planned charges for unsuspecting customers for two light bulbs was $21.60, though it cost only $3.50 to buy and distribute them. To make up the cost plus lost electricity sales, FirstEnergy planned to charge customers using an average amount of electricity 60 cents a month for three years.
FirstEnergy says it will mail or hand deliver nearly 4 million bulbs over five weeks.
The light bulb distribution program was in response to a state mandate that requires utilities to reduce energy usage by 0.3 percent this year and 22.2 percent by 2025, FirstEnergy said.
The bulbs, known by their twisty, tubular shape, use up to 75 percent less electricity than a traditional incandescent bulb. Customers can save up to $60 over the life of the bulbs, which last much longer than incandescent bulbs, the Akron-based company said.
Other utilities have similar programs, but they usually provide coupons to customers or work with retailers to make discounts or rebates available.
Those programs were rejected by FirstEnergy because they don't bring down energy usage fast enough, company spokeswoman Ellen Raines said Thursday.
"We needed to find some proactive way to get bulbs in customers' hands," she said.
Proactive was not how many customers described the program to the state's Public Service Commission, which received about 1,000 calls or e-mails Wednesday. The program was launched Monday.
Commission Chairman Alan Schriber said Thursday that the commission approved FirstEnergy's plan to hand out the bulbs, but not the rate increase.
"They just dropped the ball," he said.
Gov. Ted Strickland asked that the rollout of the program be postponed.
"Ohioans are confused and angry," he said in a letter to Schriber.
- Despite some of the most widespread hype ever given to a video game, “The Beatles: Rock Band” had a lackluster first month.
- As Wall Street sees a new era of big bonuses, Credit Suisse says it will change how it pays its employees. The NYT reports.
- David Pogue looks at Microsoft’s Windows 7, and finds it a dramatic improvement over Vista.
- CNBC takes Mitsubishi's iMiev electric car for a spin.
- What do revelations that team owners invested (and made money) with Bernie Madoff mean for the Mets?
- College can cost a fortune, but here are the most expensive schools for the 2009-2010 academic year.









