Skip navigation

Current DateTime: 12:31:59 22 Oct 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24355697
  • Where Are They Now?

      These financial titans have either stepped out of the spotlight or come to the end of their careers, voluntarily or not.

  • Cramer's 12 Recovery Stocks

      Cramer pulled together 12 stocks that he thinks will most benefit from an economic rebound.

  • 20 Stocks with Potential to Drop

      Out of the entire S&P 500, which stocks are analysts expecting to have the biggest price drops? Here's the top 20.

Light bulb program has some customers seeing red
By: The Associated Press | 08 Oct 2009 | 06:03 PM ET
Text Size

COLUMBUS, Ohio - A plan by a Midwest utility to distribute energy-efficient light bulbs to customers backfired when it was learned that the recipients would not only have to pay for the bulbs, but also pay the utility for the electricity they wouldn't be using.

Ohio's governor sent a letter to regulators who pulled the plug on the program for now, or at least on the charges that caught consumers off guard.

Utilities have been pushing consumers to become more efficient as states set new energy standards. It's not the first time consumers have felt they've been pushed too hard.

Nearly two years ago, Allegheny Power apologized for mailing energy-efficient bulbs to its 220,000 Maryland customers without letting them know they would be footing the bill. Maryland regulators said the company ignored instructions to inform customers about the program.

FirstEnergy's Ohio is now promising to work with the state's Public Service Commission to settle the dustup.

Total planned charges for unsuspecting customers for two light bulbs was $21.60, though it cost only $3.50 to buy and distribute them. To make up the cost plus lost electricity sales, FirstEnergy planned to charge customers using an average amount of electricity 60 cents a month for three years.

FirstEnergy says it will mail or hand deliver nearly 4 million bulbs over five weeks.

The light bulb distribution program was in response to a state mandate that requires utilities to reduce energy usage by 0.3 percent this year and 22.2 percent by 2025, FirstEnergy said.

The bulbs, known by their twisty, tubular shape, use up to 75 percent less electricity than a traditional incandescent bulb. Customers can save up to $60 over the life of the bulbs, which last much longer than incandescent bulbs, the Akron-based company said.

Other utilities have similar programs, but they usually provide coupons to customers or work with retailers to make discounts or rebates available.

Those programs were rejected by FirstEnergy because they don't bring down energy usage fast enough, company spokeswoman Ellen Raines said Thursday.

"We needed to find some proactive way to get bulbs in customers' hands," she said.

Proactive was not how many customers described the program to the state's Public Service Commission, which received about 1,000 calls or e-mails Wednesday. The program was launched Monday.

Commission Chairman Alan Schriber said Thursday that the commission approved FirstEnergy's plan to hand out the bulbs, but not the rate increase.

"They just dropped the ball," he said.

Gov. Ted Strickland asked that the rollout of the program be postponed.

"Ohioans are confused and angry," he said in a letter to Schriber.

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Tools:
Print EmailAdd This share icon
  • digg share

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

  • Despite some of the most widespread hype ever given to a video game, “The Beatles: Rock Band” had a lackluster first month.
  • As Wall Street sees a new era of big bonuses, Credit Suisse says it will change how it pays its employees. The NYT reports.
  • David Pogue looks at Microsoft’s Windows 7, and finds it a dramatic improvement over Vista.
  • i-MiEV
  • CNBC takes Mitsubishi's iMiev electric car for a spin.
  • What do revelations that team owners invested (and made money) with Bernie Madoff mean for the Mets?
  • College can cost a fortune, but here are the most expensive schools for the 2009-2010 academic year.
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:26:53 21 Oct 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 11:11:13 21 Oct 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 06:59:16 21 Oct 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:02:34 21 Oct 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters