Skip navigation

CNBC Guest Blog



Current DateTime: 12:05:34 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 27473928

MOST SHARED


Current DateTime: 12:05:34 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 31330905
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 12:06:45 PM

Current DateTime: 12:05:34 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452000
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 12:06:40 PM

Current DateTime: 12:05:34 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452764
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 12:06:24 PM

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 12:05:36 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 30626172

Busch: A Positive Tax Shift

Published: Tuesday, 13 Oct 2009 | 10:39 AM ET
Text Size
By: Andrew B. Busch
CNBC Contributor

Andrew Busch

Andrew Busch
Director, Global
Currency &
Public Policy
Strategist
BMO Financial
Group

One of the potential major negatives for US companies doing business overseas was the potential for a tax increase by the Obama administration to raise $200 billion. This was floated as an idea and Jason Furman communicated it to the US international corporate community by saying, "We need the money." This is a theme that will be repeated over and over as Congress and the White House attempt to pay for their programs and to contain the deficit.

However, corporate America pushed back. Changing existing tax treaties/arrangements with other countries is an extremely delicate and difficult task. Essentially, it creates more negative unintended consequences than positive tax flows into the US Treasury's coffers.

The WSJ reports that the Obama administration's back tracking on this issue, "....suggests that an administration that was critical of business at the height of the financial crisis is becoming more accommodating. The White House, through a series of presidential lunches and other outreach, is trying to soothe tensions with multinational companies." If this is true, this is a very positive development.

What I hope to see going forward from Congress and the White House is an attitude of getting the right environment for getting people back to work. This is different from the government giving people jobs and creating increased deficit spending to do it. This is about a mindset that says "I wake up every morning trying to find ways to help businesses create jobs". Currently, I don't see this attitude, but the dropping of the international tax idea is a good start.

As the criticism grows over the lack of jobs created by the $787 billion stimulus, this is the direction we need to see coming from D.C. It would signal a shift from a dogmatic "government-is-the-answer" approach to a pragmatic "business-creates-jobs" approach. This would truly signal a change that will lead to jobs and that the markets will love. Let's see if more is coming....Given how negative and detrimental the past approach has been towards business in the US, everything looks up from here.

________________________
Andrew B. Busch is Global FX Strategist at BMO Capital Markets, a recognized expert on the world financial markets and how these markets are impacted by political events, and a frequent CNBC contributor. You can comment on his piece and reach him here and you can follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/abusch .

© 2012 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Current DateTime: 09:37:12 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 09:37:12 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 11:35:13 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779197

Current DateTime: 09:37:12 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779199
CNBCCNBC
About CNBC  |  Site Map  |  Video Reprints   |  Advertise  |  Help  |  Contact
Privacy Policy  |     |  Terms of Service  |  Independent Programming Report
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2012 CNBC LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBCUniversal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters