Skip navigation
MOST POPULAR RELATED TAGS
  • TOPICS
  • SECTORS
  • COMPANIES

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 09:02:36 27 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30626172
powered by digg

CNBC Guest Blog

Text Size
Oct.13
1:18 PM ET
Tuesday, 13 Oct 2009
Providing Health Care Insurance Does Not Make Us Less Competitive
Posted By:William Dunkelberg, Economic Strategist, Boenning & Scattergood



William Dunkelberg
Economic Strategist,
Boenning & Scattergood

Michigan’s governor, appearing on Fox News Sunday (10/11), said that we need the public sector to pick up more of the health care bill so that the private sector can be more competitive.

It is this kind of flawed economic thinking that gets us into so much trouble.

Does the governor think that the public sector gets its funding from thin air, or that doctors work for nothing? Doesn’t she get it?

The private sector pays for the entire health care bill in every country under every scheme. The government does not produce stuff - the private sector does, and earns the income that pays for everything the government promises. I can pay for my health care directly, or I can pay taxes to support Medicare which pays for health care with a lot of administrative costs.

Firms don't have to provide insurance and don't have to keep up with rising costs. It's not law (yet). It is part of total compensation which includes cash, taxes and benefits. In most of the economy, this "pay package" is negotiable. Not so with union contracts however.

Healthy Horizons -- A Special ReportHealthy Horizons -- A Special Report

The governor complained that health care costs are a large part of the cost of making a U.S. car, making them less competitive.

Well, providing health insurance is not mandated (yet, anyway), and is a result of heavy-handed union activity over the past decades aided by government’s foot on the neck of the industry to avoid strikes. Union power is simply a way to tax non-union workers to the benefit of union workers by forcing companies to pay above market wages and benefits and over-charge for the union made products. This destroyed our basic steel industry and our domestic auto industry in spite of government attempts to use protectionism to shield this bad behavior.

A decade ago I and other economists predicted the demise of these companies as a result.

The only sector of the economy where unions thrive is the public sector which faces no competition and has no bottom line. Garbage collector strikes are always settled so that voters do not get too unhappy and the cost is passed on in higher taxes. Private sector firms do not have that luxury, they face “re-election” daily in a competitive market and must be efficient or “lose the election” as our steel and auto companies have.

Taxpayers spent $50 billion to save union jobs at GM – a continuation of very ill-advised policies that leave our private sector weaker. Continuing to look to government to solve our “problems” and “save us” is a downhill path to lower prosperity.

If consumers want to consume a lot of health care, it is the job of markets to provide it. Spending a lot is not a “crisis”, unless we demand too much because we face the wrong prices (“free” doctor visits for example).

If cars were “free”, we’d take a lot more of those as well.

___________________
William Dunkelberg is an Economic Strategist, Boenning & Scattergood and Chief Economist, National Federation of Independent Business.


Tools:
PrintEmailAdd This share icon
Next Post
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 06:14:06 27 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:06:03 27 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 08:46:06 27 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 07:56:29 27 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters