- US in Recovery But Jobs Growth Slow: Summers
- China's Growth Quickens But Policy Stays on Hold
- US Orders Deep Pay Cuts at Bailed-Out Companies
- Windows 7 May Help Kickstart Delayed Corporate Spend
- Windows 7 Open; Ballmer on the Outlook
- Chavez Urges 3-Minute Showers to Conserve Water
- Credit Suisse Thrashes Earnings Forecasts
- States With the Highest Unemployment Rates
- Poll: Is Obama Justified In Cutting Executive Pay?
- Falling VIX a 'Very Bad Sign': Market Expert
- Maria Bartiromo's Interview With Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
- 5-Star Stock Picks: 'Stability' in Commercial Real Estate (!)
- Oct. 21: 79 S&P Stocks Hit New 52-Week Highs
- Forget Dow 10K—S&P 1,000 is New Support Level: Strategist
- Bing To Incorporate Twitter, Facebook Updates
- Home Builders, FHA, And The Future
- Do You Have What It Takes to Make an Impact?
- Time to End TARP for Big Banks: Equity Analyst
- Ahead of the Bell: Netflix third-quarter earnings
- Ahead of the Bell: Leading economic indicators
- Russia drops $22.5 bln lawsuit against US bank
- Congress scrutinizes problems in homebuyer credit
- SKorean oil company buying Canada's Harvest Energy
- Taiwan jobless rate falls slightly in September
- British retail sales flat in September
- Anglo American to sell off noncore assets
- British postal workers begin 48-hour walkout
WASHINGTON - A controversial e-mail message buried by the Bush administration because of its conclusions on global warming surfaced Tuesday, nearly two years after it was sent to the White House and never opened.
The e-mail and the 28-page document attached to it, released Tuesday by the Environmental Protection Agency, show that back in December of 2007 the agency concluded that six gases linked to global warming pose dangers to public welfare and wanted to act to regulate their release from automobiles and the burning of gasoline.
The document specifically cites global warming's effects on air quality, agriculture, forestry, water resources and coastal areas as endangering public welfare.
That finding was rejected by the Bush White House, which strongly opposed using the Clean Air Act to deal with climate change and stalled on producing a so-called "endangerment finding" that had been ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2007.
As a result, the Dec. 5 e-mail sent by the agency to Susan Dudley, who headed the regulatory division at the Office of Management and Budget, was never opened, according to Jason Burnett, the former EPA official that wrote it.
The Bush administration, and then EPA administrator Stephen Johnson, also refused to release the document, which is labeled "deliberative, do not distribute," to Democratic lawmakers. The White House instead allowed three senators to review it in July 2008, when excerpts were released.
The Obama administration in April made a similar determination, but also concluded that greenhouse gases endanger public health. The EPA is drafting the first greenhouse gas standards for automobiles and recently signaled it would attempt to reduce climate-altering pollution from refineries, factories and other large industrial sources.
In response, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Republican lawmakers have criticized the EPA's reasoning and called for a more thorough vetting of the science. An internal review by a dozen federal agencies released in May also raised questions about the EPA's conclusion, saying the agency could have been more balanced and raising questions about the difficulty in linking global warming to health effects.
The agency released the e-mail and documents after receiving requests under the Freedom of Information Act.
Adora Andy, a spokeswoman for EPA administrator Lisa Jackson, said Tuesday that the draft shows the science in 2007 was as clear as it is today.
"The conclusions reached then by the EPA scientists should have been made public and should have been considered," she said.
___
On the Net:
EPA FOIA Reading Room: http://www.epa.gov/foia/frequent.html
- Despite some of the most widespread hype ever given to a video game, “The Beatles: Rock Band” had a lackluster first month.
- As Wall Street sees a new era of big bonuses, Credit Suisse says it will change how it pays its employees. The NYT reports.
- David Pogue looks at Microsoft’s Windows 7, and finds it a dramatic improvement over Vista.
- CNBC takes Mitsubishi's iMiev electric car for a spin.
- What do revelations that team owners invested (and made money) with Bernie Madoff mean for the Mets?
- College can cost a fortune, but here are the most expensive schools for the 2009-2010 academic year.










