Skip navigation

Sports Biz


Current DateTime: 07:23:00 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23279670
Expiration DateTime: 2/10/2012 7:24:30 PM

SPORTS BIZ SLIDESHOWS

» More

Current DateTime: 07:23:00 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 37998722

DARREN ROVELL'S SPORTS INDEX

Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

ABOUT SPORTS BIZ

Darren Rovell brings you his unique take on the business of sports: a multi-billion dollar global industry and obsession full of personalities and products. On Sports Biz, Darren will give you his up-to-date take on everything from salaries to endorsement deals to marketing and promotions, trades and tirades – in short, everything that makes sports so exciting.

Did the Mets Really Make Money Off Madoff?

Published: Wednesday, 21 Oct 2009 | 12:31 PM ET
Text Size
By: Darren Rovell
CNBC Sports Business Reporter

The headline in the Wall Street Journal this morning was certainly baffling: “Mets Win One: Owners Made Money Off Madoff.”

The reporters did a great job of unearthing the fact that a recent bankruptcy court filing revealed that two accounts associated with the Mets Limited Partnership MADE $48 million off Madoff.

Before we go any further, let’s get to the issues.

1. If the Mets Limited Partnership deposited $523 million and withdrew $571 million, how much are they entitled to keeping? The question will come down to when they withdrew the money. If it was within the last six years, they might have to give all their fictitious gains back. If the Mets Limited Partnership got a standard Madoff return (10 to 12 percent), this money was likely only active for one year. To go from $523 million to $571 million is a 9.1 percent gain.

2. All this is really a moot point if the Mets primary owners Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz did lose a significant amount of money from Madoff. The Mets have said that any money invested in Madoff will not affect the operations of the team. However, it’s hard to ignore the fact that Wilpon’s name appears 22 times on Madoff’s client list and that former Mets general manager Steve Phillips, who worked in the team’s front office from 1990 to 2003, said he “heard Bernie Madoff’s name once a week every week for 13 years.”

3. The key will be another offseason to observe the Mets actions. The Mets had a relatively quiet offseason last year when all this came out, but they also had the second highest payroll in baseball. Stuck with a team that might not be as good as they thought they were and a new ballpark that won’t automatically fill itself, the spending habits of this offseason will be a bit more telling. If the Mets ownership thinks their gains are going to have to be returned, look for them to be conservative. Johan Santana’s contract over the next two seasons is worth $43.5 million.

Questions?  Comments? 

© 2012 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Current DateTime: 09:37:11 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 02:33:42 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 11:35:14 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779197

Current DateTime: 02:56:31 10 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779199
CNBCCNBC
About CNBC  |  Site Map  |  Video Reprints   |  Advertise  |  Help  |  Contact
Privacy Policy  |     |  Terms of Service  |  Independent Programming Report
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2012 CNBC LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBCUniversal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters