- Obama to Send More Troops; Seeks Afghanistan Exit
- GM Removes CEO Henderson; Whitacre is Interim Chief
- Who Were the Biggest Winners And Losers This Year?
- Look Ahead: Markets Count Down to US Jobs Report
- GE, Comcast Complete Deal Over NBC Universal: Source
- US May Raise Rates Before Jobs Recover: Fed's Plosser
- Super Fantasy Christmas Gifts of 2009
- Cramer: Watch Tech Stocks Wednesday
- Stocks Likely Don't Need Santa to Keep Rally Going
- Unemployment to Peak at 10.5%: Moody's Economist
- 8 Stocks to Gain on Obama's Afghan Plan: Analysts
- BofA On Proposed Changes In The Housing Bailout Program
- The Future of The Media Landscape
- November Auto Sales Muddle Along
- Busch: What Obama Won't Say Tonight
- Stick with Equities—Avoid Emerging Markets: Laszlo Birinyi
- Pfizer Chomps On A Carrot
- Predictions 2010: Technology
MOST SHARED
- GE, Comcast Complete Deal Over NBC Universal: Source
- Keeping America Great
- Kohlberg Kravis Bidding for Morgan Stanley's CICC Stake
- Australia Parliament Rejects Carbon Trade Laws
- Toyota Takes Lead Position in Canada in November
- Hyundai's US Auto Sales Jump 46% in November
- New Incentive To Improve... Your Home, That Is!
- Predictions 2010: Technology
Text Size 
The New York Times
The central witness in a federal insider trading case against Raj Rajaratnam, founder of the Galleon hedge fund, has a more than 10-year history of passing on privileged information to the fund, according to federal court documents.
Roomy Khan, the witness, faxed confidential sales and pricing information for computer chips sold by Intel to Galleon in 1998, according to documents in United States District Court in San Jose, Calif. At the time, Ms. Khan worked at Intel [INTC
Loading...
()
] and had responded to requests for the information from a representative of Galleon, left unidentified in the documents.
 |
She worked at Galleon for a time in the late 1990s after the Intel incident.
Little more could be learned about the case because it was sealed by a federal court.
The San Jose Mercury News reported the links between Ms. Khan, Intel and Galleon on Friday. It reported that she pleaded guilty to wire fraud and that in 2002 a federal judge ordered Ms. Khan to serve six months of home detention and to pay $150,000 in fines and restitution.
 |
Ms. Khan has been identified as “Tipper A” or the cooperating witness in the government’s case that accuses Mr. Rajaratnam of insider trading.
Federal prosecutors said that Ms. Khan provided them with taped conversations she had with Mr. Rajaratnam and admitted to passing on inside information tied to Google and other companies. Ms. Khan has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy and securities fraud to receive a lighter sentence, according to a criminal complaint.
Court filings in the most recent case say that Ms. Khan first met Mr. Rajaratnam in 1996, while she was still at Intel and he was at the investment bank Needham & Company.
The earlier court documents described Ms. Khan as “executing the scheme and artifice to defraud” by obtaining the sales data from Intel. She would have had access to how actual shipments were matching up with previously forecast demand. She was accused of divulging six months’ worth of product and financial data.
Other details of Ms. Khan’s life point to a complex legal and financial past.
While their family has roots in Bangladesh, Ms. Khan and her husband, Sakhawat Khan, have lived in Silicon Valley for decades. Mr. Khan built a reputation as a chip designer through work at various companies. He has amassed about 30 patents that cover analog and flash memory chip technology and benefited from the sale of two start-ups, Information Storage Devices and Agate Semiconductor. Recently, Mr. Khan did work for Silicon Storage Technology [SSTI
Loading...
()
], which claims a number of his patents.
“They are both very personable and very intelligent,” said Trevor Blyth, who has been awarded a number of patents in conjunction with Mr. Khan. “Roomy was a high-energy, powerful lady.”
While the Khans lived in Atherton, one of Silicon Valley’s most exclusive neighborhoods, it remains unclear how much wealth they had accumulated over the years. The Khans were plaintiffs in a 2003 lawsuit that stemmed from the collapse of an $18.5 million real estate deal. In 2002, Robert and Ann Hyams agreed to purchase the Khans’ property, but by the end of that year decided to drop the purchase and enter into a settlement agreement with the Khans, according to court documents.
Under that settlement, the Hyams agreed to pay the Khans $650,000, but by the deadline for the payment they had wired only $5,500 to the Khans’ account. The Khans sued in San Mateo County Superior Court and were awarded the remaining $644,500, plus interest.
By 2005, the Khans’ financial situation seemed to have deteriorated.
Deutsche Bank filed an arbitration case in 2005 against the Khans and their investment firm, Digital Age Capital, for failing to pay the fees for an options brokerage account they held with the firm. They reached a settlement in August that year, under which the Khans would pay $700,000, payable in two installments of $350,000 each.
The Khans defaulted on the first payment, and Ms. Khan wrote an e-mail message to a Deutsche Bank lawyer, pleading hardship and asking for more time to pay the $700,000.
“I am currently having liquidity problems and would like to pay the full amount of $700,000 by Dec. 31, 2005,” she wrote in the message. “I assure you that we are not seeking to avoid our obligations, we just need a bit more time.”
In April, they sold their Atherton house, bought in 2000 for $10.5 million, for $9.4 million, according to county filings. The Khans are seeking a new residence in Florida, a relative said.
The Khans have not returned repeated phone calls and e-mail messages requesting comment.
The Khans settled a lawsuit last month in which they had been accused of underpaying their housekeeper. Vilma Serralta, the housekeeper, received far less than minimum wage while working more than 14 hours a day, according to the court documents. The judge in the case determined that the Khans had tried to fabricate evidence in the case, leading to the settlement.
“From what I saw in this case, I’m not surprised Ms. Khan has been charged with a crime,” said Hillary Ronen, who represented Ms. Serralta in the case. “The whole air about her was ‘how dare her servant stand up to her.’ ”
Ms. Ronen said that lawyers had to rearrange seats during settlement talks to prevent Ms. Khan from shoving Ms. Serralta.
Prosecutors have said that Ms. Khan provided Mr. Rajaratnam with tips about Polycom [PLCM
Loading...
()
], a video conferencing company. Polycom said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it placed Sunil K. Bhalla, a senior vice president and general manager in voice communications solutions, on administrative leave. A Polycom spokeswoman declined to comment beyond the filing and would not confirm that Mr. Bhalla’s suspension was connected to the insider trading investigation.
Michael J. de la Merced reported from New York and Ashlee Vance from Mountain View, Calif. Zachery Kouwe contributed reporting from New York and Dan Zehr from San Mateo, Calif.
- Will the Fed raise rates? Will the dollar continue its slide? CNBC experts weigh in on the year ahead.
- Goldman Sachs has forbidden employees from gathering in private holiday parties of 12 or more.
- Do you have what it takes to run your own business? Ask yourself these questions.
- Heavily armed pirates in Somalia have set up a sort of stock exhange to fund their hijackings.
- Since its launch in 1998, Google has become a primary force on the Internet. How much do you know about the company?
- A famed author has written all his work on an old typewriter that is now up for auction. The NYT reports.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes