10 Stocks for Kids Under 10
Instead of buying your kid the hottest toy that's going to make her friends drool, consider giving the gift that could keep on giving – stocks!
20 Stocks to Potentially Drop
Out of the entire S&P 500, which stocks are analysts expecting to have the biggest price drops?
Top Sports for Illegal Wagers
In the world of illegal gambling, sporting events are far and away the biggest money maker.

FEATURED QUIZZES

The Bubble Decade
What media company merged with America Online in 2000 only to divest of it in 2009? Click ahead and find out!
Suze Orman's Credit Card Quiz
President Obama signed into law the Credit CARD Act of 2009. How much does this effect your credit cards?
Google IQ
The name "Google" is derived from the word "googol," which means what? Take the following quiz and find out.

SPECIAL REPORTS

There's plenty of time until the April tax-filing deadline, but what you do in the last days of this year can make a big difference in the bottom line. So check out these tips.

Predictions '10
After a brutal 2009, we're all looking forward to 2010. Here's what our bloggers expect.
Holiday Central
There are plenty of reasons to believe that this Christmas holiday season will not be as bad for retailers as last year.

Fed's Power Would Be Curtailed by Financial Reform Bill

Published: Wednesday, 28 Oct 2009 | 3:58 PM ET

Text Size

By: Steve Liesman
Senior Economics Reporter

Is the Fed's independence for setting monetary policy the next thing to go?

You have to read to the last page, 253, of the regulatory reform bill unveiled Tuesday night to find one of the most historic parts. On that page, the proposed law would amend the Federal Reserve Act to take away the central bank's independent ability to bail out a specific company.

The new rule would require "written concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury" if the Fed provides any assistance to a specific company.

Moreover, the Fed can't create a unique type of vehicle to bail out a company a la the Maiden Lane investment companies. It has to be from a facility available to all.

Bottom line: the Fed could not have stepped in over those fateful nights and bailed out Bear Stearns or AIG. (For the record, the insurance wrappers for Citigroup [C Loading... () ] and Bank of America [BAC Loading... () ] would appear to have qualified.)

How concerned should markets be about this? As with many things to do with the Fed, there are philosophical and practical issues to consider.

Asked about this issue in July, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said its bailouts were all done in close consultation with the Treasury.

Also from a practical standpoint, if the Barney Frank bill becomes law it will give the government authority to resolve these big, systemically important behemoths. So the Fed should not have a need to do weekend bailout gigs.

Philosophically, though, it gets more complicated. Central banks have been acting as the "lender-of-last-resort" apart from politicians for a long time. It's one of the reasons why you have central banks and not just Treasuries: some entity that can cut through the political fog on the eve of disaster and see clearly the need to step in and lend.

Walter Bagehot is famous for writing in the 19th century about the need for central banks "to lend freely" in times of panic. The ability to do so — and the clear understanding that it can — is thought by some economists to actually underpin stability of the financial system. (Some economists argue that all it does is increase the risks that companies take — moral hazard).