![]()
- Yahoo Is in Expanding Mode, Hiring: CEO
- UK Most at Risk of Losing Top Credit Rating: Fitch
- New Lows for Stocks Next Year: Equities Bear
- GM CEO Starts Charm Tour at Opel in Germany
- Vodafone Extends Cost-Cutting Scheme, Hits Targets
- Bad Debt Weighs on Barclays Earnings
- HSBC Operating Profit Beats, US Bad Debts Slip
- Fed's Tarullo Backs Surcharges to Limit Bank Size
- Look Ahead: 'Risk On' Sentiment Could Fuel Rally Further
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Warren Buffett to Sell Stakes In Union Pacific & Norfolk Southern
- Nov. 9: Unusual Volume Leaders
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Merck’s Mega-Monday Morning
- Why are Traders Bullish on This Food Company?
- Profiting From Natural Gas: Strategists
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
MOST SHARED
- Obama Sees Strains Unless US, China Balance Growth
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
- Future of Marketing
- Mad Mail: Buy the Berkshire Hathaway Split?
- Cramer: 5 Stocks to Play the Next Bull Run
- JPMorgan Lifts Salary Freeze Amid Recovery
- Framed for Porn – By a PC Virus
- Israel: Leader of Business Innovation
- Maria's Market Message
By Jonathan Stempel NEW YORK, Oct 28 (Reuters) - It's an expensive lesson on the importance of reading your mail.
A Wisconsin judge has ordered PepsiCo Inc to pay $1.26 billion to two men who said it stole their idea to sell purified water after a secretary mislaid a document alerting the world's No. 2 soft drink maker the lawsuit existed. The case was reported earlier on Wednesday by The National Law Journal.
The judgment amount is equal to more than 20 percent of PepsiCo's reported annual profits in recent years, regulatory filings show. According to filings with the Jefferson County Circuit Court, Charles Joyce and James Voigt won the Sept. 30 judgment five months after first suing PepsiCo and two distributors.
The Wisconsin men said they talked with the distributors in 1981 about their idea to bottle and sell purified water and that PepsiCo later stole the idea by creating Aquafina. The complaint was filed on April 28, but PepsiCo said the legal department at its Purchase, New York headquarters was not alerted to the case until around Sept. 18, when secretary Kathy Henry received a letter for her supervisor Tom Tamoney.
Henry, however, put the letter aside and did not tell anyone about it or enter it into her log "because she was so busy preparing for a board meeting," according to PepsiCo's Oct. 13 motion asking the court not to enforce the judgment. The company said that, when Henry on Oct. 5 received a copy of the plaintiff's motion for the default judgment, she recalled the earlier letter and forwarded it, prompting the legal department to finally act.
It called Henry's earlier failure to forward the letter "excusable neglect." Henry said she has worked at PepsiCo for 20 years, another court filing shows. Joe Jacuzzi, a PepsiCo spokesman, said the lawsuit was without merit. He said it is "completely dubious" to argue the plaintiffs gave other companies trade secrets in 1981 and that PepsiCo used them 15 years later to develop Aquafina.
"While we acknowledge there was an internal process issue, we have been denied due process as we do not believe the plaintiffs complied with the legal requirements to properly serve PepsiCo with their motion for default judgment," he added. A lawyer for the plaintiffs did not return a call seeking comment. PepsiCo shares closed down 1 cent at $60.99 on Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange. The case is Joyce v. PepsiCo Inc, Wisconsin Circuit Court, Jefferson County, No. 2009CV000391.
CNBC.com Slideshow: Biggest Tech Blunders
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel; additional reporting by Martinne Geller; editing by Andre Grenon) Keywords: PEPSICO/JUDGMENT (jon.stempel@thomsonreuters.com +1 646 223 6317; Reuters Messaging: jon.stempel.reuters.com@reuters.net) COPYRIGHT Copyright Thomson Reuters 2009. All rights reserved.
The copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters News Content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters.
- Do free market libertarians really believe what they say about ethics and shareholder value? The Big Money takes a look.
- Cramer did the research and found eight stocks that lead the pack. Read on to get his top picks.
- On the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, many in the former Eastern Bloc recall communism fondly.
- Software, biotech firms, even banks are watching a particular Supreme Court argument today.
- From politicians to CEOs to companies, here's your chance to vote for the winners and losers of 2009.
- The health care reform bill that passed the House on Saturday will have a much harder time in the Senate.










