Media Money
- Facebook's Biggest-Ever Holiday Shopping Season
- Facebook's New Dual Class Structure - Slow Steps to an IPO
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- The Executive Job Search
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- Activision Prepares to Double Dip on ‘Modern Warfare 2’
- Salvation Army's Kettles Now Credit Card-Ready
- US Mint to Suspend American Eagle Gold 1-Ounce Coins
- Black Friday: Can Banks Tap the Frenzy, Too?
- Foreign Demand Boosts US 7-Year Treasury Sale
- Oil Friday
- 4 Thanksgiving Week Buys For Your Portfolio: Market Pros
- There's a 'Great Chance' For a Double-Dip Recession: Strategist
- Revenge of the Gangsta Nerds
- Will TCU See The "Flutie Effect?"
- Retail Earnings and Sales to Improve in Q4: Analyst
- Consumers Catching the Holiday Spirit
- It's Beginning To Look A Lot More Riskless
- Crescenzi: Claims Level Suggests End to Job Losses
- Hedge Funds Take Early Lead in Warren Buffett's 'Big Bet'
- Bankruptcies Jump, Hitting Highest Level in Four Years
- AIG, Ex-CEO Greenberg Reach Pact to Settle Disputes
- Bank of America CEO Search May Extend Into 2010
- Steepest Black Friday Discounts, Revealed
- 'Cancer of Fraud' Permeates Health Care System: Critics
- US Mint to Suspend American Eagle Gold 1-Ounce Coins
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- For Many in US, It Will Be a Scaled-Down Holiday Season
Text Size 
CNBC Correspondent
 |
AP Rupert Murdoch |
In an effort to illustrate the value of News Corp's [NWS
Loading...
()
] online content, he's laid down the gauntlet to Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] and other search engines and aggregators.
Murdoch said in an interview with Sky News Australia (which is partly owned by News Corp) that he's considering removing News Corp's articles from Google's search index; even hinting he'd consider suing Google and the BBC over what he calls "Stealing" material from his newspapers. This is a dramatic way for Murdoch to illustrate his insistence that News Corp content is paid for online, following his declaration earlier this year that he plans to charge for all the company's news Web sites by mid 2010.
Right now, if you find a WSJ.com article through a Google search, and click on the link, you're typically led to the full article on the newspaper's Web site, despite the fact that the Web site is, for the most part, behind a subscription pay wall. It would be one thing for Murdoch to say he wants to remove access to full articles, to make sure that consumers can, at most, get a headline and a link. But Murdoch is saying he wants to pull all links to his content from Google search. This is pretty dramatic considering that a full quarter of WSJ.com traffic is directed from Google search results.
Murdoch makes the point that he'd rather have fewer, higher-quality visitors that pay for access. Murdoch puts it best himself, in the Sky News interview saying: "What's the point of having someone come occasionally, who likes the headline they see in Google, come to us. Sure, we go out and say hey we have so many millions of visitors, advertise.... the fact is there's not enough advertising in the world to go around to make all the Web sites profitable."
News Corp's newspaper division could use some help.
Operating income for the business unit dropped to just $25 million in the company's most recent quarter, down from $134 million in the year-ago period. The question is whether Murdoch will go through with his threat to remove his content from Google search results, and what kind of effect (perhaps even disastrous) it could have on News Corp's Web sites' traffic. Could Murdoch be picking on Google in order to forge a profitable relationship with Microsoft's [MSFT
Loading...
()
] upstart Bing search engine? Perhaps, but it seems like he isn't too happy with the way Microsoft links to News Corp content either.
Google says it's happy to stop indexing any Web site, per that company's request. But Google's comments on the subject make it clear how ridiculous the company thinks that request would be for a news organization. Google says in a statement: "Publishers put their content on the web because they want it to be found."
Check out Murdoch's 37-minute interview yourself. It's long, but most of his most dramatic comments are within the first 10 minutes.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes