- This Season: Everybody's A Scrooge
- Warren Buffett, Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' At Columbia
- Senate Democrats at Odds Over Health Care Bill
- What if a Recovery Is All in Your Head?
- Thanksgiving Week Stuffed With Economic News
- A Taxpayer's Must Read: The Fed Waltz With AIG
- Newspaper Circulation May Be Worse Than it Looks
- 10 Tips to Get Out of Debt
- Investors to Goldman: Be Less Greedy
- U.S. Stocks Slip, Dollar Rises
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Holiday Tipping: Who And How Much
- Report: Ill. prison deal could create 3,000 jobs
- Proposal to merge black schools draws fire
- Promoters have faith in ‘holy hip-hop’
- Real estate agents see return of foreign buyers
- Newspaper circulation may be worse than it looks
- Accounting rule helps boost some newspapers
- Holidays will again test NYC air travel bottleneck
- RI slow to spend millions in stimulus funding
- Rising unemployment taxes could hinder hiring
JACKSON, Miss. - Mississippi Medicaid officials should have asked the Legislature for approval before tinkering with a law that would change reimbursements for pharmacists, the state Supreme Court has ruled.
The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a chancery judge's ruling that the Division of Medicaid had no authority to change how pharmacists were paid to fill prescriptions for people enrolled in the program. Medicaid is a federal-state health insurance program for the needy, aged, blind and disabled and for low-income families with children.
The pharmacies sued Medicaid in 2008 shortly after the program sought to implement the new method of payments. The pharmacies said state law gives the Legislature sole authority to change the reimbursement plan unless there was a federal mandate.
Under Medicaid, states reimburse pharmacies for the cost of medicine provided to patients on the program. In the fiscal year that ended June 30, Mississippi spent $328 million on its Medicaid pharmacy program.
Justice Randy Pierce, writing Thursday for the Supreme Court, said while the courts usually bow to agencies on issues or rules and regulations, Medicaid officials acted outside their authority.
"This court takes no issue with Division of Medicaid's desire to cut costs during economic uncertainty ... While we recognize the particularly difficult financial position in which Medicaid finds itself, this court will not allow the plain language of the law to be swept away in the interest of cost containment. The formula for reimbursement was established by statute, and cannot be varied by the Division of Medicaid," Pierce wrote.
Assistant Attorney General Harold Pizzetta argued to the Supreme Court in September that lawmakers in 2003 gave the Medicaid Division more discretion to define costs and reimbursements. He said the proposed rule change was only that.
A Hinds County judge found three methods in state law to determine how much a pharmacist would be reimbursed for dispensing generic drugs. He said Medicaid exceeded its authority in adding a fourth method without the Legislature amending state law.
- Technology can make or break a fortune in the world of alternative energy.
- Warren Buffett and Bill Gates discusses the economy and other subjects with CNBC's Becky Quick.
- Many people are facing the holidays with substantially smaller incomes. Here’s how some are adapting.
- Jim Cramer is a proponent of stocks that pay healthy dividends, and here are his top five dividend plays.
- The homebuyer's tax credit jacked sales for a while, but 2010 is looking weak. Now what?
- CNBC’s technology reporter Jim Goldman guides you through the best gadgets to buy this holiday season.









