Pharma's Market
SPECIAL REPORT
MOST SHARED
- Nielsen Ratings Coming to Video Games
- The Week Ahead
- Oil Next Week
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Bove: Expect Goldman To Increase Dividend Meaningfully
- Realty Check: USDA Home Loans
- Hershey Mulls $17 Billion Bid for Cadbury: Source
- Hot Topics at TEDMED
- Lightning Round OT: Knight Capital, Ebix and More
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Holiday Tipping: Who And How Much
- Deep Discounts Should Make It a Very Tech-y Holiday
- Thanksgiving Week Stuffed With Economic News
- First Senate Vote Looms on Health Legislation
- Black Friday Deals May Not Signal Retail Comeback
- Victoria's Secret Hopes to Rekindle Desire for Lingerie
- UPS sets new rates for 2010
- Wall Street Jobs Slow to Return Despite Record Profits
- Investors to Goldman: Be Less Greedy
- Senate panel to mull Bernanke nomination on Dec. 3
- $6M Verdict Upheld in McDonald's Strip Search Case
PHARMA'S MARKET VIDEO

Cholesterol Drug Battle: Niaspan vs. Zetia
16 Nov 2009
Cardiologist Grades Cholesterol Drug Study
16 Nov 2009
Merck's Cholesterol Drugs Under Pressure
16 Nov 2009
Cholesterol Drug Battle: Merck vs. Abbott Labs
16 Nov 2009
Cholesterol Drug Battle
16 Nov 2009
Novo Nordisk CEO on Diabetes Epidemic
13 Nov 2009
RSS FEED
CNBC Correspondent
It doesn't always happen, but there is a common to-and-fro, push-and-pull, back-and-forth or whatever you want to call it between reporters and corporate PR folks. I don't particularly like that part of my job, but sometimes it just comes with the territory. I've got my job to do and they've got theirs. I get it.
However, earlier this week a Merck PR guy asked me, "Why are you making this such a big deal? It's a 200-patient study." When I tweeted it, one of my journalism pals on Twitter replied that they'd (I'm shielding their identity and gender) been told even worse on several occasions by various corp comm pitbulls: "Don't embarrass yourself," they reportedly said in a desperate last-ditch attempt to get a story spiked. I think if anyone ever said that to me I'd blow a gasket.
![]() |
The Merck [MRK
Loading...
()
] rep was referring to our coverage plans for the Arbiter 6 clinical trial results that are coming out next Monday morning at 8 a.m. ET at the American Heart Association meeting and, according to analysts, simultaneously in "The New England Journal of Medicine."
I'll be reporting live from the event in Orlando on "Squawk Box" starting at 7:30 a.m. with a curtain-raiser and then with the breaking news at the top of the next hour.
I wonder if "New York Times" reporter Natasha Singer got the same treatment from Merck as I did. She wrote a big takeout on the test that pitted MRK's Zetia/Vytorin against Abbott's Niaspan [ABT
Loading...
()
]. In the print edition the story appears on the front page of the business section under the headline, "Cholesterol Study Rivets An Industry."
That apparently prompted "The Wall Street Journal Health Blog" to do kind of a counterpoint piece titled, "The Next Vytorin Study: Why Is Everybody So Worked Up?" I know Merck has to love that.
One analyst, Leerink Swann's Seamus Fernandez, says much of the reaction to the study will be dictated by the tone of two editorials he says will appear in NEJM alongside the results. But JPMorgan's Chris Schott says in a research note to clients this week, "The key swing factor when considering the potential impact to the (Vytorin/Zetia) cholesterol franchise will be the degree of media focus around the study."
We reporters get it from all sides.
Questions? Comments? and follow me on Twitter at mhuckman










