- Tuesday's Heavy Dose of Data to Dictate 'Risk' Behavior
- World's Largest Share Issue Priced at Deep Discount
- Obama says Boosting US Jobs is Top Priority
- GM to Cut up to 9,500 Jobs in Europe
- Playboy to Outsource Most Magazine Operations: Report
- Why the Dollar Will Likely Stay Weak for Some Time
- Appeals Court Denies Microsoft's Alcatel Petition
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Cramer: What Monday’s Housing Number Really Means
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- HP's Mark Hurd
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- 9 Stocks That Play Rising Water Costs: Strategists
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Gold Prices Can Double in 3 Years: Portfolio Manager
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- Ex-spy, submarines, Dubai co. part of US lawsuit
- Nokia to ax 220 R&D jobs in Japan
- Denmark's climate minister to head climate summit
- EU drops Qualcomm antitrust probe
- Strong banks, weak credit: Treasury rethinks TARP
- SPIN METER: Legislation inflation grips GOP
- SKorean trade chief urges US to move on agreement
- Singapore tourism falls slightly in October
- Poll: Americans conflicted over health overhaul
Text Size 
MONTGOMERY, Ala. - The Obama administration is opposing former Gov. Don Siegelman's appeal of his felony corruption conviction before the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that federal prosecutors presented enough evidence to prove bribery.
Siegelman, a Democrat like the president, and former HealthSouth Corp. CEO Richard Scrushy claim their case raises broad questions about how much evidence is needed to prove that bribery occurred. They contend the conduct in question was routine politics.
The Justice Department filed papers late Friday contending the law lets jurors infer criminal conduct even if there was no explicit agreement of a bribery scheme.
"Under a standard that requires not just a quid pro quo, but one that is verbally spelled out with all 'i's dotted and 't's crossed, all but the most careless public officials will be able to avoid criminal liability for exchanging official action for campaign contributions," the government argued.
The Birmingham News first reported the filing by the Obama administration's solicitor general.
Siegelman was convicted of swapping $500,000 in donations arranged by Scrushy for Siegelman's statewide lottery campaign in exchange for HealthSouth retaining a seat on a powerful state medical regulatory board.
The defense argues the donations Scrushy made to Siegelman's lottery fund and Siegelman's subsequent appointment of Scrushy to the state health board were normal political dealings, not criminal.
The filing Friday said the court does not need to take up the appeal.
Siegelman and Scrushy were convicted in 2006. Siegelman began serving a sentence of more than seven years but was released on bond during his appeal. Scrushy, sentenced to almost seven years, remains in prison because a judge ruled he was a flight risk if freed.
___
Information from: The Birmingham News, http://www.al.com/birminghamnews
Print
Email
- A diet high in fat and sugar might actually be good for your portfolio.
- Warren Buffett and Bill Gates discuss the economy and other subjects with CNBC's Becky Quick.
- From the AIG&T to the Merrill Lychee, Jane Wells lists this year's fashionable holiday cocktails.
- The show attracts a big TV audience every year, but this year it may take on even more importance.
- …you'll want to be prepared. Tips for getting the most out of the post-Thanksgiving shopping frenzy.
- Congressman Ron Paul explains to Squawk Box why he’s pushing legislation to audit the Federal Reserve.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes